mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Agnostic learning in (almost) optimal time via Gaussian surface area

arXiv 2603.06027 ↗First posted 6 Mar 2026cs.LG cs.DS stat.MLcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The complexity of learning a concept class under Gaussian marginals in the difficult agnostic model is closely related to its L1-approximability by low-degree polynomials. For any concept class with Gaussian surface area at most Gamma, Klivans et al. (2008) show that degree d = O(Gamma2 / varepsilon4) suffices to achieve an varepsilon-approximation. This leads to the best-known bounds on the complexity of learning a variety of concept classes. In this note, we improve their analysis by showing that degree d = tilde O (Gamma2 / varepsilon2) is enough. In light of lower bounds due to Diakonikolas et al. (2021), this yields (near) optimal bounds on the complexity of agnostically learning polynomial threshold functions in the statistical query model. Our proof relies on a direct analogue of a construction of Feldman et al. (2020), who considered L1-approximation on the Boolean hypercube.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 7 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Mar 2026.

Builds on

7 of 30 references.

References · 7

  1. 2021The Optimality of Polynomial Regression for Agnostic Learning under Gaussian Marginalscited by 52
  2. 2015Complexity Theoretic Limitations on Learning Halfspacescited by 50
  3. 2017Learning Geometric Concepts with Nasty Noisecited by 46
  4. 2020Non-Convex SGD Learns Halfspaces with Adversarial Label Noisecited by 30
  5. 2014A PTAS for Agnostically Learning Halfspacescited by 21
  6. 2022Hardness of Agnostically Learning Halfspaces from Worst-Case Lattice Problemscited by 16
  7. 2025A Mysterious Connection Between Tolerant Junta Testing and Agnostically Learning Conjunctionscited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.