mlsanityData to 13 Oct 2026

Unsupervised domain adaptation for radioisotope identification in gamma spectroscopy

arXiv 2603.05719 ↗First posted 5 Mar 2026cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Training machine learning models for radioisotope identification using gamma spectroscopy remains an elusive challenge for many practical applications, largely stemming from the difficulty of acquiring and labeling large, diverse experimental datasets. Simulations can mitigate this challenge, but the accuracy of models trained on simulated data can deteriorate substantially when deployed to an out-of-distribution operational environment. In this study, we demonstrate that unsupervised domain adaptation (UDA) can improve the ability of a model trained on synthetic data to generalize to a new testing domain, provided unlabeled data from the target domain is available. Conventional supervised techniques are unable to utilize this data because the absence of isotope labels precludes defining a supervised classification loss. We compare a range of different UDA techniques, finding that feature alignment strategies, particularly via maximum mean discrepancy (MMD) minimization or domain-adversarial training, yield the most consistent improvement to testing scores. For instance, using a custom transformer-based neural network, we achieve a testing accuracy of 0.904 ± 0.022 on an experimental LaBr3 test set after performing unsupervised feature alignment via MMD minimization, compared to 0.754 ± 0.014 before alignment. Overall, our results highlight the potential of using UDA to adapt a radioisotope classifier trained on synthetic data for real-world deployment.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 13 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 71 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Mar 2026.

Builds on

23 of 71 references.

References · 23

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,106
  2. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,320
  3. 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 12,009
  4. 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,336
  5. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,515
  6. 2017On Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 4,902
  7. 2015Domain-Adversarial Training of Neural Networkscited by 3,030
  8. 2018UMAP: Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection for Dimension Reductioncited by 2,870
  9. 2019Optuna: A Next-generation Hyperparameter Optimization Frameworkcited by 2,472
  10. 2016A Baseline for Detecting Misclassified and Out-of-Distribution Examples in Neural Networkscited by 2,371
  11. 2015Learning Transferable Features with Deep Adaptation Networkscited by 1,324
  12. 2017Adversarial Discriminative Domain Adaptationcited by 1,310
11 more
  1. 2016Deep CORAL: Correlation Alignment for Deep Domain Adaptationcited by 1,196
  2. 2018Computational Optimal Transportcited by 772
  3. 2019Object Detection in 20 Years: A Surveycited by 528
  4. 2020A Brief Review of Domain Adaptationcited by 287
  5. 2018DeepJDOT: Deep Joint Distribution Optimal Transport for Unsupervised Domain Adaptationcited by 213
  6. 2022Revisiting Neural Scaling Laws in Language and Visioncited by 130
  7. 2024Scaling laws for learning with real and surrogate datacited by 27
  8. 2024Sim-to-real supervised domain adaptation for radioisotope identificationcited by 3
  9. 2019An Application of CNNs to Time Sequenced One Dimensional Data in Radiation Detectioncited by 2
  10. 2020Transfer Learning in Automated Gamma Spectral Identificationcited by 2
  11. 2025Improvement of Nuclide Detection through Graph Spectroscopic Analysis Framework and its Application to Nuclear Facility Upset Detectioncited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.