mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Why Depth Matters in Parallelizable Sequence Models: A Lie Algebraic View

arXiv 2603.05573 ↗First posted 5 Mar 2026cs.LGcited by 1

On the map: State-space sequence models (S4, Mamba) → Core SSM architectures for language

Abstract (arXiv)

Scalable sequence models, such as Transformer variants and structured state-space models, often trade expressivity power for sequence-level parallelism, which enables efficient training. Here we examine the bounds on error and how error scales when models operate outside of their expressivity regimes using a Lie-algebraic control perspective. Our theory formulates a correspondence between the depth of a sequence model and the tower of Lie algebra extensions. Echoing recent theoretical studies, we characterize the Lie-algebraic class of constant-depth sequence models and their corresponding expressivity bounds. Furthermore, we analytically derive an approximation error bound and show that error diminishes exponentially as the depth increases, consistent with the strong empirical performance of these models. We validate our theoretical predictions using experiments on symbolic word and continuous-valued state-tracking problems.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Core SSM architectures for language, one of 10 directions in State-space sequence models (S4, Mamba). Builds on 40 of its 75 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Mar 2026.

Builds on

40 of 75 references.

Closest ancestors · 4

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024Unlocking State-Tracking in Linear RNNs Through Negative Eigenvalues19 Nov
  2. 2024Theoretical Foundations of Deep Selective State-Space Models29 Feb
  3. 2023Gated Linear Attention Transformers with Hardware-Efficient Training11 Dec
  4. 2023Mamba: Linear-Time Sequence Modeling with Selective State Spaces1 Dec

Other references · 36

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2020Transformers are RNNs: Fast Autoregressive Transformers with Linear Attentioncited by 1,979
  3. 2020Rethinking Attention with Performerscited by 1,584
  4. 2018Learning Latent Dynamics for Planning from Pixelscited by 1,221
  5. 2018Universal Transformerscited by 613
  6. 2021Linear Transformers Are Secretly Fast Weight Programmerscited by 471
  7. 2023Resurrecting Recurrent Neural Networks for Long Sequencescited by 397
  8. 2024Parallelizing Linear Transformers with the Delta Rule over Sequence Lengthcited by 373
  9. 2021Random Feature Attentioncited by 350
  10. 2024xLSTM: Extended Long Short-Term Memorycited by 320
  11. 2019Theoretical Limitations of Self-Attention in Neural Sequence Modelscited by 286
  12. 2022Transformers Learn Shortcuts to Automatacited by 260
24 more
  1. 2022Neural Networks and the Chomsky Hierarchycited by 214
  2. 2024The Illusion of State in State-Space Modelscited by 181
  3. 2022TransDreamer: Reinforcement Learning with Transformer World Modelscited by 143
  4. 2020Neural Rough Differential Equations for Long Time Seriescited by 140
  5. 2023What Formal Languages Can Transformers Express? A Surveycited by 120
  6. 2018On the Practical Computational Power of Finite Precision RNNs for Language Recognitioncited by 117
  7. 2021The Devil is in the Detail: Simple Tricks Improve Systematic Generalization of Transformerscited by 117
  8. 2016A Primer on the Signature Method in Machine Learningcited by 100
  9. 2025DeltaProduct: Improving State-Tracking in Linear RNNs via Householder Productscited by 69
  10. 2021The Neural Data Router: Adaptive Control Flow in Transformers Improves Systematic Generalizationcited by 62
  11. 2020A Formal Hierarchy of RNN Architecturescited by 61
  12. 2024MoEUT: Mixture-of-Experts Universal Transformerscited by 55
  13. 2023Entity Tracking in Language Modelscited by 44
  14. 2024Log Neural Controlled Differential Equations: The Lie Brackets Make a Differencecited by 34
  15. 2025PaTH Attention: Position Encoding via Accumulating Householder Transformationscited by 32
  16. 2023Sparse Universal Transformercited by 28
  17. 2024Understanding the differences in Foundation Models: Attention, State Space Models, and Recurrent Neural Networkscited by 26
  18. 2023Practical Computational Power of Linear Transformers and Their Recurrent and Self-Referential Extensionscited by 20
  19. 2025Structured Linear CDEs: Maximally Expressive and Parallel-in-Time Sequence Modelscited by 16
  20. 2024Real-Time Recurrent Learning using Trace Units in Reinforcement Learningcited by 10
  21. 2024On Limitation of Transformer for Learning HMMscited by 9
  22. 2026The Expressive Limits of Diagonal SSMs for State-Trackingcited by 9
  23. 2025Bridging Expressivity and Scalability with Adaptive Unitary SSMscited by 8
  24. 2025Transformers Provably Learn Directed Acyclic Graphs via Kernel-Guided Mutual Informationcited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025A Little Depth Goes a Long Way: The Expressive Power of Log-Depth Transformers
  2. 2025Design Principles for Sequence Models via Coefficient Dynamics
  3. 2026An Algebraic View of the Expressivity of Recurrent Language Models
  4. 2025The Effect of Depth on the Expressivity of Deep Linear State-Space Models
  5. 2026On Subquadratic Architectures: From Applications to Principles
  6. 2024Repeat After Me: Transformers are Better than State Space Models at Copying
  7. 2026Expressivity-Efficiency Tradeoffs for Hybrid Sequence Models
  8. 2024Chain of Thought Empowers Transformers to Solve Inherently Serial Problems