Rethinking Representativeness and Diversity in Dynamic Data Selection
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Dynamic data selection accelerates training by sampling a changing subset of the dataset while preserving accuracy. We rethink two core notions underlying sample evaluation: representativeness and diversity. Instead of local geometric centrality, we define representativeness as coverage of dataset-level common or high-frequency feature factors. Instead of within-subset dispersion, we define diversity at the process level, requiring the selection trajectory to gradually include complementary rare factors over training. Based on this view, we propose a dynamic selection framework with three components. First, we score representativeness in a plug-in feature space to prioritize samples covering frequent factors. We instantiate this with a sparse autoencoder trained on the target dataset, using sparse unit activations to summarize both individual samples and dataset-wide factor statistics. Second, we realize process-level diversity by combining rare-factor sampling with a Usage-Frequency Penalty that promotes sample rotation, provably discourages monopoly, and reduces gradient bias. Third, we couple the two-dimensional scoring with a smooth scheduler that transitions selection from core-pattern consolidation to rare-factor exploration, without extra gradients, influence estimates, or second-order computations on the training model. Extensive experiments on five benchmarks across vision and text tasks demonstrate improved accuracy-efficiency trade-offs across models. Our method matches or exceeds full-data accuracy with over 2x training acceleration. Code will be released.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 29 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Mar 2026.
Builds on
29 of 38 references.
References · 29
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
- 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,364
- 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 14,132
- 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,372
- 2020Training data-efficient image transformers & distillation through attentioncited by 4,586
- 2023Improved Baselines with Visual Instruction Tuningcited by 4,418
- 2023Sparse Autoencoders Find Highly Interpretable Features in Language Modelscited by 1,420
- 2024Scaling and evaluating sparse autoencoderscited by 553
- 2021Deep Learning on a Data Diet: Finding Important Examples Early in Trainingcited by 533
- 2022Beyond neural scaling laws: beating power law scaling via data pruningcited by 528
- 2017A Downsampled Variant of ImageNet as an Alternative to the CIFAR datasetscited by 377
17 more
- 2023Data Selection for Language Models via Importance Resamplingcited by 329
- 2024A Survey on Data Selection for Language Modelscited by 236
- 2013k-Sparse Autoencoderscited by 215
- 2020Contextual Diversity for Active Learningcited by 139
- 2022Dataset Pruning: Reducing Training Data by Examining Generalization Influencecited by 133
- 2023InfoBatch: Lossless Training Speed Up by Unbiased Dynamic Data Pruningcited by 90
- 2023Data Pruning via Moving-one-Sample-outcited by 67
- 2024Clustering and Ranking: Diversity-preserved Instruction Selection through Expert-aligned Quality Estimationcited by 53
- 2021Accelerating Deep Learning with Dynamic Data Pruningcited by 43
- 2024G-DIG: Towards Gradient-based Diverse and High-quality Instruction Data Selection for Machine Translationcited by 30
- 2023Repeated Random Sampling for Minimizing the Time-to-Accuracy of Learningcited by 26
- 2025SAE-V: Interpreting Multimodal Models for Enhanced Alignmentcited by 23
- 2024A CLIP-Powered Framework for Robust and Generalizable Data Selectioncited by 21
- 2025Data Pruning by Information Maximizationcited by 15
- 2025Diversity-driven Data Selection for Language Model Tuning through Sparse Autoencodercited by 12
- 2024Mastering Collaborative Multi-modal Data Selection: A Focus on Informativeness, Uniqueness, and Representativenesscited by 10
- 2025Disentangling the Roles of Representation and Selection in Data Pruningcited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.
2 papers.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Model-Agnostic Dynamic Feature Selection with Uncertainty Quantification
- 2025Learning from the Best, Differently: A Diversity-Driven Rethinking on Data Selection
- 2026When Sample Selection Bias Precipitates Model Collapse
- 2025Diffusion-Driven High-Dimensional Variable Selection
- 2025Computational Budget Should Be Considered in Data Selection
- 2026Hierarchical Data Selection via Manifold Coverage and Sparse Feature Coverage in LLM Post-training
- 2025Equally Critical: Samples, Targets, and Their Mappings in Datasets
- 2026Data Density Scaling Laws for Image Self-Distillation