mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Rethinking Representativeness and Diversity in Dynamic Data Selection

arXiv 2603.04981 ↗First posted 5 Mar 2026cs.AIcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Dynamic data selection accelerates training by sampling a changing subset of the dataset while preserving accuracy. We rethink two core notions underlying sample evaluation: representativeness and diversity. Instead of local geometric centrality, we define representativeness as coverage of dataset-level common or high-frequency feature factors. Instead of within-subset dispersion, we define diversity at the process level, requiring the selection trajectory to gradually include complementary rare factors over training. Based on this view, we propose a dynamic selection framework with three components. First, we score representativeness in a plug-in feature space to prioritize samples covering frequent factors. We instantiate this with a sparse autoencoder trained on the target dataset, using sparse unit activations to summarize both individual samples and dataset-wide factor statistics. Second, we realize process-level diversity by combining rare-factor sampling with a Usage-Frequency Penalty that promotes sample rotation, provably discourages monopoly, and reduces gradient bias. Third, we couple the two-dimensional scoring with a smooth scheduler that transitions selection from core-pattern consolidation to rare-factor exploration, without extra gradients, influence estimates, or second-order computations on the training model. Extensive experiments on five benchmarks across vision and text tasks demonstrate improved accuracy-efficiency trade-offs across models. Our method matches or exceeds full-data accuracy with over 2x training acceleration. Code will be released.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 29 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Mar 2026.

Builds on

29 of 38 references.

References · 29

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  2. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
  3. 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,364
  4. 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 14,132
  5. 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,372
  6. 2020Training data-efficient image transformers & distillation through attentioncited by 4,586
  7. 2023Improved Baselines with Visual Instruction Tuningcited by 4,418
  8. 2023Sparse Autoencoders Find Highly Interpretable Features in Language Modelscited by 1,420
  9. 2024Scaling and evaluating sparse autoencoderscited by 553
  10. 2021Deep Learning on a Data Diet: Finding Important Examples Early in Trainingcited by 533
  11. 2022Beyond neural scaling laws: beating power law scaling via data pruningcited by 528
  12. 2017A Downsampled Variant of ImageNet as an Alternative to the CIFAR datasetscited by 377
17 more
  1. 2023Data Selection for Language Models via Importance Resamplingcited by 329
  2. 2024A Survey on Data Selection for Language Modelscited by 236
  3. 2013k-Sparse Autoencoderscited by 215
  4. 2020Contextual Diversity for Active Learningcited by 139
  5. 2022Dataset Pruning: Reducing Training Data by Examining Generalization Influencecited by 133
  6. 2023InfoBatch: Lossless Training Speed Up by Unbiased Dynamic Data Pruningcited by 90
  7. 2023Data Pruning via Moving-one-Sample-outcited by 67
  8. 2024Clustering and Ranking: Diversity-preserved Instruction Selection through Expert-aligned Quality Estimationcited by 53
  9. 2021Accelerating Deep Learning with Dynamic Data Pruningcited by 43
  10. 2024G-DIG: Towards Gradient-based Diverse and High-quality Instruction Data Selection for Machine Translationcited by 30
  11. 2023Repeated Random Sampling for Minimizing the Time-to-Accuracy of Learningcited by 26
  12. 2025SAE-V: Interpreting Multimodal Models for Enhanced Alignmentcited by 23
  13. 2024A CLIP-Powered Framework for Robust and Generalizable Data Selectioncited by 21
  14. 2025Data Pruning by Information Maximizationcited by 15
  15. 2025Diversity-driven Data Selection for Language Model Tuning through Sparse Autoencodercited by 12
  16. 2024Mastering Collaborative Multi-modal Data Selection: A Focus on Informativeness, Uniqueness, and Representativenesscited by 10
  17. 2025Disentangling the Roles of Representation and Selection in Data Pruningcited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Model-Agnostic Dynamic Feature Selection with Uncertainty Quantification
  2. 2025Learning from the Best, Differently: A Diversity-Driven Rethinking on Data Selection
  3. 2026When Sample Selection Bias Precipitates Model Collapse
  4. 2025Diffusion-Driven High-Dimensional Variable Selection
  5. 2025Computational Budget Should Be Considered in Data Selection
  6. 2026Hierarchical Data Selection via Manifold Coverage and Sparse Feature Coverage in LLM Post-training
  7. 2025Equally Critical: Samples, Targets, and Their Mappings in Datasets
  8. 2026Data Density Scaling Laws for Image Self-Distillation