mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Learning from the Best, Differently: A Diversity-Driven Rethinking on Data Selection

arXiv 2510.18909 ↗First posted 21 Oct 2025cs.CL cs.AIcited by 1

On the map: LLM reasoning → Reasoning benchmarks and evaluation

Abstract (arXiv)

High-quality pre-training data is crutial for large language models, where quality captures factual reliability and semantic value, and diversity ensures broad coverage and distributional heterogeneity. Existing approaches typically rely on single or multiple-dimensional score-based selection. However, directly selecting top-scored data often degrades performance, and sampling from a broader range is required to recover results. The above non-monotonicity between dataset scores and downstream benchmark results reveals a fundamental bias: score-based methods collapse correlated dimensions, causing top-scored data to appear high-quality while systematically overlooking diversity. We argue that ensuring diversity requires decomposing correlated metrics into orthogonal feature dimensions, from which the top-scored data can be directly selected. Therefore, we proposed the Orthogonal Diversity-Aware Selection (ODiS) algorithm, which preserves both quality and diversity during data selection. First, ODiS evaluates data from multiple dimensions, covering language quality, knowledge quality, and comprehension difficulty. The multi-dimensional scores are then decorrelated via Principal Component Analysis (PCA), yielding orthogonal evaluation dimensions. For each dimension, a Roberta-based scorer is trained to regress the data onto PCA-projected scores, enabling scalable inference on large corpora. Finally, ODiS constructs the training dataset by selecting top-scored data within each orthogonal dimension, thereby ensuring both quality and diversity. Empirical results show that ODiS-selected data exhibit less than 2% inter-dimension overlap, confirming orthogonality between dimensions. More importantly, models trained with ODiS-selected data significantly outperform other baselines on downstream benchmarks, highlighting the necessity of orthogonal, diversity-aware data selection for LLMs.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Reasoning benchmarks and evaluation, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 29 of its 37 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Oct 2025.

Builds on

29 of 37 references.

Closest ancestors · 1

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Models27 Feb

Other references · 28

  1. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
  2. 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,599
  3. 2025DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learningcited by 6,330
  4. 2022PaLM: Scaling Language Modeling with Pathwayscited by 5,326
  5. 2018Think you have Solved Question Answering? Try ARC, the AI2 Reasoning Challengecited by 4,886
  6. 2019HellaSwag: Can a Machine Really Finish Your Sentence?cited by 4,100
  7. 2019PIQA: Reasoning about Physical Commonsense in Natural Languagecited by 2,883
  8. 2024The FineWeb Datasets: Decanting the Web for the Finest Text Data at Scalecited by 1,160
  9. 2020How Much Knowledge Can You Pack Into the Parameters of a Language Model?cited by 719
  10. 2021Deduplicating Training Data Makes Language Models Bettercited by 714
  11. 2023Textbooks Are All You Needcited by 569
  12. 2019CCNet: Extracting High Quality Monolingual Datasets from Web Crawl Datacited by 548
16 more
  1. 2023Data Selection for Language Models via Importance Resamplingcited by 329
  2. 2024RedPajama: an Open Dataset for Training Large Language Modelscited by 182
  3. 2023CulturaX: A Cleaned, Enormous, and Multilingual Dataset for Large Language Models in 167 Languagescited by 174
  4. 2024Nemotron-CC: Transforming Common Crawl into a Refined Long-Horizon Pretraining Datasetcited by 160
  5. 2024QuRating: Selecting High-Quality Data for Training Language Modelscited by 157
  6. 2023D4: Improving LLM Pretraining via Document De-Duplication and Diversificationcited by 150
  7. 2023The BigScience ROOTS Corpus: A 1.6TB Composite Multilingual Datasetcited by 148
  8. 2024How Do Large Language Models Acquire Factual Knowledge During Pretraining?cited by 90
  9. 2024Perplexed by Perplexity: Perplexity-Based Data Pruning With Small Reference Modelscited by 84
  10. 2025Ultra-FineWeb: Efficient Data Filtering and Verification for High-Quality LLM Training Datacited by 38
  11. 2024Harnessing Diversity for Important Data Selection in Pretraining Large Language Modelscited by 34
  12. 2025Meta-rater: A Multi-dimensional Data Selection Method for Pre-training Language Modelscited by 19
  13. 2025QuaDMix: Quality-Diversity Balanced Data Selection for Efficient LLM Pretrainingcited by 16
  14. 2024SoftDedup: an Efficient Data Reweighting Method for Speeding Up Language Model Pre-trainingcited by 12
  15. 2025Diversity-driven Data Selection for Language Model Tuning through Sparse Autoencodercited by 12
  16. 2024Efficient Pretraining Data Selection for Language Models via Multi-Actor Collaborationcited by 10

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024Rethinking Data Selection at Scale: Random Selection is Almost All You Need
  2. 2024Take the essence and discard the dross: A Rethinking on Data Selection for Fine-Tuning Large Language Models
  3. 2025Diverse, not Short: A Length-Controlled Data Selection Strategy for Improving Response Diversity of Language Models
  4. 2024Diversify and Conquer: Diversity-Centric Data Selection with Iterative Refinement
  5. 2025TACOS: Open Tagging and Comparative Scoring for Instruction Fine-Tuning Data Selection
  6. 2024On the Diversity of Synthetic Data and its Impact on Training Large Language Models
  7. 2026Aligning the Query Space: Greedy Information Projection for Language Model Data Selection
  8. 2025Joint Selection for Large-Scale Pre-Training Data via Policy Gradient-based Mask Learning