MPCEval: A Benchmark for Multi-Party Conversation Generation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Multi-party conversation generation, such as smart reply and collaborative assistants, is an increasingly important capability of generative AI, yet its evaluation remains a critical bottleneck. Compared to two-party dialogue, multi-party settings introduce distinct challenges, including complex turn-taking, role-dependent speaker behavior, long-range conversational structure, and multiple equally valid continuations. Accordingly, we introduce MPCEval, a task-aware evaluation and benchmarking suite for multi-party conversation generation. MPCEval decomposes generation quality into speaker modeling, content quality, and speaker--content consistency, and explicitly distinguishes local next-turn prediction from global full-conversation generation. It provides novel, quantitative, reference-free, and reproducible metrics that scale across datasets and models. We apply MPCEval to diverse public and real-world datasets and evaluate modern generation methods alongside human-authored conversations. The results reveal systematic, dimension-specific model characteristics in participation balance, content progression and novelty, and speaker--content consistency, demonstrating that evaluation objectives critically shape model assessment and that single-score evaluation obscures fundamental differences in multi-party conversational behavior. The implementation of MPCEval and the associated evaluation code are publicly available at https://github.com/Owen-Yang-18/MPCEval.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 54 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Mar 2026.
Builds on
25 of 54 references.
References · 25
- 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
- 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,626
- 2019BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTcited by 5,512
- 2023G-Eval: NLG Evaluation using GPT-4 with Better Human Alignmentcited by 2,276
- 2024A Survey on LLM-as-a-Judgecited by 1,423
- 2015A Diversity-Promoting Objective Function for Neural Conversation Modelscited by 1,077
- 2021BARTScore: Evaluating Generated Text as Text Generationcited by 722
- 2021Transformer in Transformercited by 633
- 2018Texygen: A Benchmarking Platform for Text Generation Modelscited by 491
- 2022Towards a Unified Multi-Dimensional Evaluator for Text Generationcited by 264
- 2020USR: An Unsupervised and Reference Free Evaluation Metric for Dialog Generationcited by 188
- 2019Survey on Evaluation Methods for Dialogue Systemscited by 126
13 more
- 2022Human Evaluation of Conversations is an Open Problem: comparing the sensitivity of various methods for evaluating dialogue agentscited by 62
- 2026The Llama 4 Herd: Architecture, Training, Evaluation, and Deployment Notescited by 30
- 2021DeliData: A dataset for deliberation in multi-party problem solvingcited by 26
- 2024A Survey on Recent Advances in Conversational Data Generationcited by 23
- 2017Addressee and Response Selection in Multi-Party Conversations with Speaker Interaction RNNscited by 21
- 2019Interconnected Question Generation with Coreference Alignment and Conversation Flow Modelingcited by 20
- 2022Generating Information-Seeking Conversations from Unlabeled Documentscited by 17
- 2021NeuralWOZ: Learning to Collect Task-Oriented Dialogue via Model-Based Simulationcited by 16
- 2022HeterMPC: A Heterogeneous Graph Neural Network for Response Generation in Multi-Party Conversationscited by 16
- 2023Is ChatGPT a Good Multi-Party Conversation Solver?cited by 13
- 2021DG2: Data Augmentation Through Document Grounded Dialogue Generationcited by 10
- 2025Generalizability of Large Language Model-Based Agents: A Comprehensive Surveycited by 10
- 2023RADE: Reference-Assisted Dialogue Evaluation for Open-Domain Dialoguecited by 7
Built on by
Not cited yet.