mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Benchmarking Emergent Coordination in Large-Scale LLM Populations: An Evaluation Framework on the MoltBook Archive

arXiv 2603.03555 ↗First posted 3 Mar 2026cs.MA cs.AI cs.SIcited by 1

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → General LLM agent frameworks and benchmarks

Abstract (arXiv)

As multi-agent Large Language Model (LLM) systems scale, evaluating their emergent coordination dynamics becomes increasingly critical. However, current evaluation paradigms-focused on single agents or small, explicitly structured groups-fail to capture the self-organization and viral information dynamics that arise in large, decentralized populations. We introduce a systematic evaluation framework to benchmark role specialization, information diffusion, and cooperative task resolution in open agent environments. We demonstrate this framework on the MoltBook Observatory Archive, a dataset of 2.73M interactions among 90,704 autonomous agents, establishing quantitative baselines for emergent coordination. Our evaluation reveals a pronounced core-periphery structure (silhouette 0.91), heavy-tailed cascade distributions (α = 2.57), and severe coordination overhead in decentralized task resolution (Cohen's d = -0.88 against a single-agent baseline). By providing standardized evaluation tasks and empirical baselines, our framework enables the rigorous comparison of future multi-agent protocols and establishes evaluation itself as an object of scientific study.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in General LLM agent frameworks and benchmarks, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 9 of its 24 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Mar 2026.

Builds on

9 of 24 references.

Closest ancestors · 2

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2023MetaGPT: Meta Programming for A Multi-Agent Collaborative Framework1 Aug
  2. 2023CAMEL: Communicative Agents for "Mind" Exploration of Large Language Model Society31 Mar

Other references · 7

  1. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  2. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
  3. 2023Generative Agents: Interactive Simulacra of Human Behaviorcited by 3,500
  4. 2023AutoGen: Enabling Next-Gen LLM Applications via Multi-Agent Conversationcited by 1,906
  5. 2023Encouraging Divergent Thinking in Large Language Models through Multi-Agent Debatecited by 995
  6. 2017Emergence of Grounded Compositional Language in Multi-Agent Populationscited by 257
  7. 2020Emergent Multi-Agent Communication in the Deep Learning Eracited by 168

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025MultiAgentBench: Evaluating the Collaboration and Competition of LLM agents
  2. 2025Benchmarking LLMs' Swarm intelligence
  3. 2025Emergent Coordination in Multi-Agent Language Models
  4. 2026Silo-Bench: A Scalable Environment for Evaluating Distributed Coordination in Multi-Agent LLM Systems
  5. 2026Scaling Behavior of Single LLM-Driven Multi-Agent Systems
  6. 2026DPBench: Structural Determinants of Multi-Agent LLM Coordination Under Simultaneous Resource Contention
  7. 2024BattleAgentBench: A Benchmark for Evaluating Cooperation and Competition Capabilities of Language Models in Multi-Agent Systems
  8. 2026MASBench: Benchmarking LLM-based Multi-Agent Collaboration under Partial Observability