From Complex Dynamics to DynFormer: Rethinking Transformers for PDEs
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Partial differential equations (PDEs) are fundamental for modeling complex physical systems, yet classical numerical solvers face prohibitive computational costs in high-dimensional and multi-scale regimes. While Transformer-based neural operators have emerged as powerful data-driven alternatives, they conventionally treat all discretized spatial points as uniform, independent tokens. This monolithic approach ignores the intrinsic scale separation of physical fields, applying computationally prohibitive global attention that redundantly mixes smooth large-scale dynamics with high-frequency fluctuations. Rethinking Transformers through the lens of complex dynamics, we propose DynFormer, a novel dynamics-informed neural operator. Rather than applying a uniform attention mechanism across all scales, DynFormer explicitly assigns specialized network modules to distinct physical scales. It leverages a Spectral Embedding to isolate low-frequency modes, enabling a Kronecker-structured attention mechanism to efficiently capture large-scale global interactions with reduced complexity. Concurrently, we introduce a Local-Global-Mixing transformation. This module utilizes nonlinear multiplicative frequency mixing to implicitly reconstruct the small-scale, fast-varying turbulent cascades that are slaved to the macroscopic state, without incurring the cost of global attention. Integrating these modules into a hybrid evolutionary architecture ensures robust long-term temporal stability. Extensive memory-aligned evaluations across four PDE benchmarks demonstrate that DynFormer achieves up to a 95% reduction in relative error compared to state-of-the-art baselines, while significantly reducing GPU memory consumption. Our results establish that embedding first-principles physical dynamics into Transformer architectures yields a highly scalable, theoretically grounded blueprint for PDE surrogate modeling.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 38 of its 75 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Mar 2026.
Builds on
38 of 75 references.
References · 38
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
- 2021RoFormer: Enhanced Transformer with Rotary Position Embeddingcited by 4,581
- 2020Fourier Neural Operator for Parametric Partial Differential Equationscited by 2,806
- 2020Fourier Features Let Networks Learn High Frequency Functions in Low Dimensional Domainscited by 2,170
- 2019DeepONet: Learning nonlinear operators for identifying differential equations based on the universal approximation theorem of operatorscited by 1,965
- 2015Convolutional LSTM Network: A Machine Learning Approach for Precipitation Nowcastingcited by 1,428
- 2020Neural Operator: Graph Kernel Network for Partial Differential Equationscited by 722
- 2022Fourier Neural Operator with Learned Deformations for PDEs on General Geometriescited by 416
- 2021Choose a Transformer: Fourier or Galerkincited by 333
- 2023GNOT: A General Neural Operator Transformer for Operator Learningcited by 321
- 2017PDE-Net: Learning PDEs from Datacited by 304
- 2024Transolver: A Fast Transformer Solver for PDEs on General Geometriescited by 299
26 more
- 2021U-FNO -- An enhanced Fourier neural operator-based deep-learning model for multiphase flowcited by 292
- 2021Physics-informed neural networks with hard constraints for inverse designcited by 277
- 2022Transformer for Partial Differential Equations' Operator Learningcited by 270
- 2021Multiwavelet-based Operator Learning for Differential Equationscited by 229
- 2023Spherical Fourier Neural Operators: Learning Stable Dynamics on the Spherecited by 225
- 2017Hidden Physics Models: Machine Learning of Nonlinear Partial Differential Equationscited by 208
- 2018PDE-Net 2.0: Learning PDEs from Data with A Numeric-Symbolic Hybrid Deep Networkcited by 208
- 2023Convolutional Neural Operators for robust and accurate learning of PDEscited by 207
- 2024Poseidon: Efficient Foundation Models for PDEscited by 186
- 2022MIONet: Learning multiple-input operators via tensor productcited by 180
- 2023Towards Foundation Models for Scientific Machine Learning: Characterizing Scaling and Transfer Behaviorcited by 128
- 2023Scalable Transformer for PDE Surrogate Modelingcited by 123
- 2023In-Context Operator Learning with Data Prompts for Differential Equation Problemscited by 98
- 2024Weak baselines and reporting biases lead to overoptimism in machine learning for fluid-related partial differential equationscited by 87
- 2022Deep transfer operator learning for partial differential equations under conditional shiftcited by 83
- 2022NOMAD: Nonlinear Manifold Decoders for Operator Learningcited by 81
- 2023Separable Physics-Informed Neural Networkscited by 64
- 2023Improved Operator Learning by Orthogonal Attentioncited by 58
- 2025FourCastNet 3: A geometric approach to probabilistic machine-learning weather forecasting at scalecited by 56
- 2023Training neural operators to preserve invariant measures of chaotic attractorscited by 43
- 2024Data-Efficient Operator Learning via Unsupervised Pretraining and In-Context Learningcited by 32
- 2022NeuralEF: Deconstructing Kernels by Deep Neural Networkscited by 26
- 2022Neural Eigenfunctions Are Structured Representation Learnerscited by 16
- 2023Deciphering and integrating invariants for neural operator learning with various physical mechanismscited by 15
- 2024Deep Neural Operator Enabled Digital Twin Modeling for Additive Manufacturingcited by 14
- 2023Broadband Ground Motion Synthesis via Generative Adversarial Neural Operators: Development and Validationcited by 12
Built on by
Not cited yet.