mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

REGAL: A Registry-Driven Architecture for Deterministic Grounding of Agentic AI in Enterprise Telemetry

arXiv 2603.03018 ↗First posted 3 Mar 2026cs.AI cs.SEcited by 1

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Software engineering coding agents

Abstract (arXiv)

Enterprise engineering organizations produce high-volume, heterogeneous telemetry from version control systems, CI/CD pipelines, issue trackers, and observability platforms. Large Language Models (LLMs) enable new forms of agentic automation, but grounding such agents on private telemetry raises three practical challenges: limited model context, locally defined semantic concepts, and evolving metric interfaces. We present REGAL, a registry-driven architecture for deterministic grounding of agentic AI systems in enterprise telemetry. REGAL adopts an explicitly architectural approach: deterministic telemetry computation is treated as a first-class primitive, and LLMs operate over a bounded, version-controlled action space rather than raw event streams. The architecture combines (1) a Medallion ELT pipeline that produces replayable, semantically compressed Gold artifacts, and (2) a registry-driven compilation layer that synthesizes Model Context Protocol (MCP) tools from declarative metric definitions. The registry functions as an "interface-as-code" layer, ensuring alignment between tool specification and execution, mitigating tool drift, and embedding governance policies directly at the semantic boundary. A prototype implementation and case study validate the feasibility of deterministic grounding and illustrate its implications for latency, token efficiency, and operational governance. This work systematizes an architectural pattern for enterprise LLM grounding; it does not propose new learning algorithms, but rather elevates deterministic computation and semantic compilation to first-class design primitives for agentic systems.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Software engineering coding agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 6 of its 16 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Mar 2026.

Builds on

6 of 16 references.

References · 6

  1. 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 14,132
  2. 2020Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Taskscited by 9,297
  3. 2018Spider: A Large-Scale Human-Labeled Dataset for Complex and Cross-Domain Semantic Parsing and Text-to-SQL Taskcited by 1,139
  4. 2017Seq2SQL: Generating Structured Queries from Natural Language using Reinforcement Learningcited by 687
  5. 2024Retrieval-Augmented Generation with Graphs (GraphRAG)cited by 172
  6. 2013Highly Available Transactions: Virtues and Limitations (Extended Version)cited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Mind the Metrics: Patterns for Telemetry-Aware In-IDE AI Application Development using the Model Context Protocol (MCP)
  2. 2026Agent-Native Telemetry: Verifiable State-Delta Evidence for Autonomous Operations
  3. 2026A Reference Architecture for Integrating Agentic AI into Enterprise Software: Responsibilities, Interactions, and Variability
  4. 2026BTS-AgentBench: A Deterministic, Replayable Pipeline from Read-Only Telemetry Logs to Agent Benchmarks
  5. 2026When Agentic Executions Fail: Detecting and Localizing Runtime Faults from Telemetry
  6. 2026Execution-bound advisory automation for agentic AI: a reproducible AIBOM-driven CSAF-VEX framework
  7. 2026Harness as an Asset: Enforcing Determinism via the Convergent AI Agent Framework (CAAF)
  8. 2026Orchestral AI: A Framework for Agent Orchestration