From Shallow to Deep: Pinning Semantic Intent via Causal GRPO
On the map: LLM reasoning → Reasoning for agents, planning and code
also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)
Large Language Models remain vulnerable to adversarial prefix attacks (e.g., ``Sure, here is'') despite robust standard safety. We diagnose this vulnerability as Shallow Safety Alignment, stemming from a pathology we term semantic representation decay: as the model generates compliant prefixes, its internal malicious intent signal fades. To address this, we propose Two-Stage Causal-GRPO (TSC-GRPO), a framework designed to achieve intent pinning. First, grounded in causal identifiability theory, we train a causal intent probe to disentangle invariant intent from stylistic perturbations. Second, we internalize this causal awareness into the policy via Group Relative Policy Optimization. By employing a cumulative causal penalty within ``fork-in-the-road'' training scenarios, we force the model to learn that accumulating harmful tokens monotonically decreases reward, enabling robust late-stage refusals. Experiments show that TSC-GRPO significantly outperforms baselines in defending against jailbreak attacks while preserving general utility.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Reasoning for agents, planning and code, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 32 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Mar 2026.
Builds on
32 of 38 references.
References · 32
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
- 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,192
- 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 12,865
- 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 9,743
- 2021Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Codecited by 8,053
- 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 7,916
- 2024Qwen2.5 Technical Reportcited by 4,713
- 2021Program Synthesis with Large Language Modelscited by 3,509
- 2022Constitutional AI: Harmlessness from AI Feedbackcited by 2,950
- 2021TruthfulQA: Measuring How Models Mimic Human Falsehoodscited by 2,919
- 2023Universal and Transferable Adversarial Attacks on Aligned Language Modelscited by 2,914
- 2023Jailbreaking Black Box Large Language Models in Twenty Queriescited by 1,326
20 more
- 2020RealToxicityPrompts: Evaluating Neural Toxic Degeneration in Language Modelscited by 1,235
- 2023Fine-tuning Aligned Language Models Compromises Safety, Even When Users Do Not Intend To!cited by 1,106
- 2021Ethical and social risks of harm from Language Modelscited by 957
- 2023AutoDAN: Generating Stealthy Jailbreak Prompts on Aligned Large Language Modelscited by 738
- 2023"Do Anything Now": Characterizing and Evaluating In-The-Wild Jailbreak Prompts on Large Language Modelscited by 457
- 2024Jailbreaking Leading Safety-Aligned LLMs with Simple Adaptive Attackscited by 450
- 2024Safety Alignment Should Be Made More Than Just a Few Tokens Deepcited by 450
- 2023DeepInception: Hypnotize Large Language Model to Be Jailbreakercited by 337
- 2023A Wolf in Sheep's Clothing: Generalized Nested Jailbreak Prompts can Fool Large Language Models Easilycited by 242
- 2024ShieldGemma: Generative AI Content Moderation Based on Gemmacited by 224
- 2024Jailbreak Attacks and Defenses Against Large Language Models: A Surveycited by 215
- 2025Skywork-Reward-V2: Scaling Preference Data Curation via Human-AI Synergycited by 204
- 2018The Malicious Use of Artificial Intelligence: Forecasting, Prevention, and Mitigationcited by 159
- 2025Aegis2.0: A Diverse AI Safety Dataset and Risks Taxonomy for Alignment of LLM Guardrailscited by 122
- 2018Spreading vectors for similarity searchcited by 114
- 2022Why Should Adversarial Perturbations be Imperceptible? Rethink the Research Paradigm in Adversarial NLPcited by 99
- 2024CodeChameleon: Personalized Encryption Framework for Jailbreaking Large Language Modelscited by 65
- 2023Disinformation Capabilities of Large Language Modelscited by 23
- 2025Think Twice, Generate Once: Safeguarding by Progressive Self-Reflectioncited by 11
- 2025Efficient Safety Retrofitting Against Jailbreaking for LLMscited by 4
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025SAID: Safety-Aware Intent Defense via Prefix Probing for Large Language Models
- 2025Exploring the Vulnerability of the Content Moderation Guardrail in Large Language Models via Intent Manipulation
- 2026Causal Front-Door Adjustment for Robust Jailbreak Attacks on LLMs
- 2024Defending Large Language Models against Jailbreak Attacks via Semantic Smoothing
- 2025Formalization Driven LLM Prompt Jailbreaking via Reinforcement Learning
- 2026Truth Lies Deep: Countering Semantic Camouflage via Latent Intent Verification
- 2026Text-Anchored Semantic Perturbations for Transferable Jailbreak Attacks on Multimodal Large Language Models
- 2024DrAttack: Prompt Decomposition and Reconstruction Makes Powerful LLM Jailbreakers