Universal Conceptual Structure in Neural Translation: Probing NLLB-200's Multilingual Geometry
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Do neural machine translation models learn language-universal conceptual representations, or do they merely cluster languages by surface similarity? We investigate this question by probing the representation geometry of Meta's NLLB-200, a 200-language encoder-decoder Transformer, through six experiments that bridge NLP interpretability with cognitive science theories of multilingual lexical organization. Using the Swadesh core vocabulary list embedded across 135 languages, we find that the model's embedding distances significantly correlate with phylogenetic distances from the Automated Similarity Judgment Program (ρ = 0.13, p = 0.020), demonstrating that NLLB-200 has implicitly learned the genealogical structure of human languages. We show that frequently colexified concept pairs from the CLICS database exhibit significantly higher embedding similarity than non-colexified pairs (U = 42656, p = 1.33 × 10-11, d = 0.96), indicating that the model has internalized universal conceptual associations. Per-language mean-centering of embeddings improves the between-concept to within-concept distance ratio by a factor of 1.19, providing geometric evidence for a language-neutral conceptual store analogous to the anterior temporal lobe hub identified in bilingual neuroimaging. Semantic offset vectors between fundamental concept pairs (e.g., man to woman, big to small) show high cross-lingual consistency (mean cosine = 0.84), suggesting that second-order relational structure is preserved across typologically diverse languages. We release InterpretCognates, an open-source interactive toolkit for exploring these phenomena, alongside a fully reproducible analysis pipeline.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 28 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Feb 2026.
Builds on
15 of 28 references.
References · 15
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
- 2013Efficient Estimation of Word Representations in Vector Spacecited by 4,346
- 2019Unsupervised Cross-lingual Representation Learning at Scalecited by 3,907
- 2022No Language Left Behind: Scaling Human-Centered Machine Translationcited by 1,290
- 2019BERT Rediscovers the Classical NLP Pipelinecited by 1,046
- 2019What Does BERT Look At? An Analysis of BERT's Attentioncited by 994
- 2019Analyzing Multi-Head Self-Attention: Specialized Heads Do the Heavy Lifting, the Rest Can Be Prunedcited by 844
- 2019How multilingual is Multilingual BERT?cited by 642
- 2017All-but-the-Top: Simple and Effective Postprocessing for Word Representationscited by 205
- 2022The Geometry of Multilingual Language Model Representationscited by 94
- 2020Multi-SimLex: A Large-Scale Evaluation of Multilingual and Cross-Lingual Lexical Semantic Similaritycited by 38
3 more
Built on by
Not cited yet.