GroupEnsemble: Efficient Uncertainty Estimation for DETR-based Object Detection
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Detection Transformer (DETR) and its variants show strong performance on object detection, a key task for autonomous systems. However, a critical limitation of these models is that their confidence scores only reflect semantic uncertainty, failing to capture the equally important spatial uncertainty. This results in an incomplete assessment of the detection reliability. On the other hand, Deep Ensembles can tackle this by providing high-quality spatial uncertainty estimates. However, their immense memory consumption makes them impractical for real-world applications. A cheaper alternative, Monte Carlo (MC) Dropout, suffers from high latency due to the need of multiple forward passes during inference to estimate uncertainty. To address these limitations, we introduce GroupEnsemble, an efficient and effective uncertainty estimation method for DETR-like models. GroupEnsemble simultaneously predicts multiple individual detection sets by feeding additional diverse groups of object queries to the transformer decoder during inference. Each query group is transformed by the shared decoder in isolation and predicts a complete detection set for the same input. An attention mask is applied to the decoder to prevent inter-group query interactions, ensuring each group detects independently to achieve reliable ensemble-based uncertainty estimation. By leveraging the decoder's inherent parallelism, GroupEnsemble efficiently estimates uncertainty in a single forward pass without sequential repetition. We validated our method under autonomous driving scenes and common daily scenes using the Cityscapes and COCO datasets, respectively. The results show that a hybrid approach combining MC-Dropout and GroupEnsemble outperforms Deep Ensembles on several metrics at a fraction of the cost. The code is available at https://github.com/yutongy98/GroupEnsemble.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 27 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Mar 2026.
Builds on
27 of 32 references.
References · 27
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,498
- 2015Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networkscited by 9,617
- 2020End-to-End Object Detection with Transformerscited by 7,384
- 2019nuScenes: A multimodal dataset for autonomous drivingcited by 4,485
- 2016The Cityscapes Dataset for Semantic Urban Scene Understandingcited by 4,427
- 2015Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 4,416
- 2016Simple and Scalable Predictive Uncertainty Estimation using Deep Ensemblescited by 3,888
- 2020Deformable DETR: Deformable Transformers for End-to-End Object Detectioncited by 3,410
- 2017What Uncertainties Do We Need in Bayesian Deep Learning for Computer Vision?cited by 2,335
- 2020YOLOv4: Optimal Speed and Accuracy of Object Detectioncited by 1,624
- 2022DN-DETR: Accelerate DETR Training by Introducing Query DeNoisingcited by 486
15 more
- 2021Conditional DETR for Fast Training Convergencecited by 422
- 2017Semantic Foggy Scene Understanding with Synthetic Datacited by 401
- 2020Pitfalls of In-Domain Uncertainty Estimation and Ensembling in Deep Learningcited by 208
- 2017Dropout Sampling for Robust Object Detection in Open-Set Conditionscited by 112
- 2020Multivariate Confidence Calibration for Object Detectioncited by 98
- 2022Group DETR: Fast DETR Training with Group-Wise One-to-Many Assignmentcited by 96
- 2020Masksembles for Uncertainty Estimationcited by 88
- 2018Towards Safe Autonomous Driving: Capture Uncertainty in the Deep Neural Network For Lidar 3D Vehicle Detectioncited by 82
- 2018Probabilistic Object Detection: Definition and Evaluationcited by 55
- 2018Evaluating Merging Strategies for Sampling-based Uncertainty Techniques in Object Detectioncited by 51
- 2025SpaceDrive: Infusing Spatial Awareness into VLM-based Autonomous Drivingcited by 28
- 2022ZigZag: Universal Sampling-free Uncertainty Estimation Through Two-Step Inferencecited by 15
- 2025AGO: Adaptive Grounding for Open World 3D Occupancy Predictioncited by 9
- 2025Revisiting Gradient-based Uncertainty for Monocular Depth Estimationcited by 5
- 2025TQD-Track: Temporal Query Denoising for 3D Multi-Object Trackingcited by 4
Built on by
Not cited yet.