mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

GCTAM: Global and Contextual Truncated Affinity Combined Maximization Model For Unsupervised Graph Anomaly Detection

arXiv 2603.01806 ↗First posted 2 Mar 2026cs.SI cs.GR cs.LGcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Anomalies often occur in real-world information networks/graphs, such as malevolent users, malicious comments, banned users, and fake news in social graphs. The latest graph anomaly detection methods use a novel mechanism called truncated affinity maximization (TAM) to detect anomaly nodes without using any label information and achieve impressive results. TAM maximizes the affinities among the normal nodes while truncating the affinities of the anomalous nodes to identify the anomalies. However, existing TAM-based methods truncate suspicious nodes according to a rigid threshold that ignores the specificity and high-order affinities of different nodes. This inevitably causes inefficient truncations from both normal and anomalous nodes, limiting the effectiveness of anomaly detection. To this end, this paper proposes a novel truncation model combining contextual and global affinity to truncate the anomalous nodes. The core idea of the work is to use contextual truncation to decrease the affinity of anomalous nodes, while global truncation increases the affinity of normal nodes. Extensive experiments on massive real-world datasets show that our method surpasses peer methods in most graph anomaly detection tasks. In highlights, compared with previous state-of-the-art methods, the proposed method has +15% ~ +20% improvements in two famous real-world datasets, Amazon and YelpChi. Notably, our method works well in large datasets, Amazin-all and YelpChi-all, and achieves the best results, while most previous models cannot complete the tasks.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 31 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Mar 2026.

Builds on

19 of 31 references.

References · 19

  1. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,160
  2. 2016Semi-Supervised Classification with Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 11,282
  3. 2019Predicting Dynamic Embedding Trajectory in Temporal Interaction Networkscited by 443
  4. 2020Enhancing Graph Neural Network-based Fraud Detectors against Camouflaged Fraudsterscited by 248
  5. 2019Deep Graph Library: A Graph-Centric, Highly-Performant Package for Graph Neural Networkscited by 241
  6. 2022Rethinking Graph Neural Networks for Anomaly Detectioncited by 185
  7. 2021Anomaly Detection on Attributed Networks via Contrastive Self-Supervised Learningcited by 175
  8. 2020AnomalyDAE: Dual autoencoder for anomaly detection on attributed networkscited by 81
  9. 2021Generative and Contrastive Self-Supervised Learning for Graph Anomaly Detectioncited by 67
  10. 2022Graph Anomaly Detection via Multi-Scale Contrastive Learning Networks with Augmented Viewcited by 54
  11. 2020GCN-Based User Representation Learning for Unifying Robust Recommendation and Fraudster Detectioncited by 53
  12. 2022TwiBot-22: Towards Graph-Based Twitter Bot Detectioncited by 44
7 more
  1. 2023Truncated Affinity Maximization: One-class Homophily Modeling for Graph Anomaly Detectioncited by 43
  2. 2020Toward Deep Supervised Anomaly Detection: Reinforcement Learning from Partially Labeled Anomaly Datacited by 42
  3. 2021Hop-Count Based Self-Supervised Anomaly Detection on Attributed Networkscited by 31
  4. 2022Cross-Domain Graph Anomaly Detection via Anomaly-aware Contrastive Alignmentcited by 31
  5. 2022Reconstruction Enhanced Multi-View Contrastive Learning for Anomaly Detection on Attributed Networkscited by 28
  6. 2021Graph Contrastive Learning for Anomaly Detectioncited by 22
  7. 2024Generative Semi-supervised Graph Anomaly Detectioncited by 22

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.

3 papers.