What Papers Don't Tell You: Recovering Tacit Knowledge for Automated Paper Reproduction
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Automated paper reproduction -- generating executable code from academic papers -- is bottlenecked not by information retrieval but by the tacit knowledge that papers inevitably leave implicit. We formalize this challenge as the progressive recovery of three types of tacit knowledge -- relational, somatic, and collective -- and propose method, a graph-based agent framework with a dedicated mechanism for each: node-level relation-aware aggregation recovers relational knowledge by analyzing implementation-unit-level reuse and adaptation relationships between the target paper and its citation neighbors; execution-feedback refinement recovers somatic knowledge through iterative debugging driven by runtime signals; and graph-level knowledge induction distills collective knowledge from clusters of papers sharing similar implementations. On an extended ReproduceBench spanning 3 domains, 10 tasks, and 40 recent papers, method achieves an average performance gap of 10.04% against official implementations, improving over the strongest baseline by 24.68%. The code will be publicly released upon acceptance; the repository link will be provided in the final version.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Mar 2026.
Builds on
10 of 38 references.
References · 10
- 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,160
- 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,355
- 2018Deeper Insights into Graph Convolutional Networks for Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 1,099
- 2020Improving Reproducibility in Machine Learning Research (A Report from the NeurIPS 2019 Reproducibility Program)cited by 318
- 2025PaperBench: Evaluating AI's Ability to Replicate AI Researchcited by 286
- 2024RepairAgent: An Autonomous, LLM-Based Agent for Program Repaircited by 225
- 2025Paper2Code: Automating Code Generation from Scientific Papers in Machine Learningcited by 67
- 2025The Distracting Effect: Understanding Irrelevant Passages in RAGcited by 32
- 2025AutoReproduce: Automatic AI Experiment Reproduction with Paper Lineagecited by 29
- 2025Plan-over-Graph: Towards Parallelable LLM Agent Schedulecited by 13
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 6.
6 papers.
- 2026The Last Human-Written Paper: Agent-Native Research Artifactscited by 12
- 2026TokenDance: Scaling Multi-Agent LLM Serving via Collective KV Cache Sharingcited by 8
- 2026CoACT: Action-Preserving Observation Compression for Coding Agentscited by 4
- 2026To See is Not to Master: Teaching LLMs to Use Private Libraries for Code Generationcited by 3
- 2026Grammar-Constrained Decoding Can Jailbreak LLMs into Generating Malicious Codecited by 0
- 2026RECLAIM: Can Agents Reproduce the Claims of Machine Learning Papers?cited by 0
- 2026RECLAIM: Can Agents Reproduce the Claims of Machine Learning Papers?23 Sep 2026
- 2026CoACT: Action-Preserving Observation Compression for Coding Agents3 Jul 2026
- 2026Grammar-Constrained Decoding Can Jailbreak LLMs into Generating Malicious Code10 Jun 2026
- 2026The Last Human-Written Paper: Agent-Native Research Artifacts27 Apr 2026
- 2026TokenDance: Scaling Multi-Agent LLM Serving via Collective KV Cache Sharing3 Apr 2026
- 2026To See is Not to Master: Teaching LLMs to Use Private Libraries for Code Generation16 Mar 2026