Markovian ODE-guided scoring can assess the quality of offline reasoning traces in language models
On the map: LLM reasoning → Reasoning benchmarks and evaluation
Abstract (arXiv)
Reasoning traces produced by generative language models are increasingly used for tasks ranging from mathematical problem solving to automated fact checking. However, existing evaluation methods remain largely mechanical and fail to capture human-centric notions of reasoning quality in a way that generalizes across varied and progressively degraded reasoning. We introduce MarODE, an offline evaluation framework that assigns quality scores to reasoning traces. Its effectiveness is assessed using human-centric perturbations and human judgments, which jointly evaluate the fundamental dimensions of an evaluation metric - goodness and soundness. The approach is grounded in a Markovian formulation of reasoning progression and an ordinary differential equation based characterization of trace dynamics, enabling efficient evaluation of reasoning quality. In a large-scale evaluation, MarODE outperforms existing baselines by over 250% under Somers' D correlation. Our results emphasize the value of theory-driven evaluation frameworks as reasoning traces become central to language model-based systems.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Reasoning benchmarks and evaluation, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 11 of its 61 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Mar 2026.
Builds on
11 of 61 references.
Closest ancestors · 1
Same direction, newest first
Other references · 10
- 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 9,743
- 2022Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Modelscited by 5,601
- 2023Qwen Technical Reportcited by 3,273
- 2025Towards Reasoning Era: A Survey of Long Chain-of-Thought for Reasoning Large Language Modelscited by 381
- 2020Stable Neural Flowscited by 25
- 2025Statistical Uncertainty Quantification for Aggregate Performance Metrics in Machine Learning Benchmarkscited by 10
- 2025Chain-of-Thought as a Lens: Evaluating Structured Reasoning Alignment between Human Preferences and Large Language Modelscited by 5
- 2025A Survey of Automatic Evaluation Methods on Text, Visual and Speech Generationscited by 4
- 2025GPT-OSS-20B: A Comprehensive Deployment-Centric Analysis of OpenAI's Open-Weight Mixture of Experts Modelcited by 2
- 2024A Step Towards Mixture of Grader: Statistical Analysis of Existing Automatic Evaluation Metricscited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Filtered Reasoning Score: Evaluating Reasoning Quality on a Model's Most-Confident Traces
- 2024Functional Benchmarks for Robust Evaluation of Reasoning Performance, and the Reasoning Gap
- 2026Measuring AI Reasoning: A Guide for Researchers
- 2025Catch Me If You Can: How Smaller Reasoning Models Pretend to Reason with Mathematical Fidelity
- 2025BeyondBench: Contamination-Resistant Evaluation of Reasoning in Language Models
- 2026Probing the Trajectories of Reasoning Traces in Large Language Models
- 2026Characterizing, Evaluating, and Optimizing Complex Reasoning
- 2025The Metacognitive Bottleneck: Japanese Riddles Reveal Fundamental Limits of Machine Insight and Self-Evaluation in Reasoning AI