mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

A Step Towards Mixture of Grader: Statistical Analysis of Existing Automatic Evaluation Metrics

arXiv 2410.10030 ↗First posted 13 Oct 2024cs.CL cs.AIcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The explosion of open-sourced models and Question-Answering (QA) datasets emphasizes the importance of automated QA evaluation. We studied the statistics of the existing evaluation metrics for a better understanding of their limitations. By measuring the correlation coefficients of each evaluation metric concerning human-like evaluation score, we observed the following: (1) existing metrics have a high correlation among them concerning the question type (e.g., single word, single phrase, etc.), (2) no single metric can adequately estimate the human-like evaluation. As a potential solution, we discuss how a Mixture Of Grader could potentially improve the auto QA evaluator quality.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 2 of its 6 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Oct 2024.

Builds on

2 of 6 references.

References · 2

  1. 2024Length-Controlled AlpacaEval: A Simple Way to Debias Automatic Evaluatorscited by 865
  2. 2023Evaluating Correctness and Faithfulness of Instruction-Following Models for Question Answeringcited by 150

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.