mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Better Matching, Less Forgetting: A Quality-Guided Matcher for Transformer-based Incremental Object Detection

arXiv 2603.01524 ↗First posted 2 Mar 2026cs.CVcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Incremental Object Detection (IOD) aims to continuously learn new object classes without forgetting previously learned ones. A persistent challenge is catastrophic forgetting, primarily attributed to background shift in conventional detectors. While pseudo-labeling mitigates this in dense detectors, we identify a novel, distinct source of forgetting specific to DETR-like architectures: background foregrounding. This arises from the exhaustiveness constraint of the Hungarian matcher, which forcibly assigns every ground truth target to one prediction, even when predictions primarily cover background regions (i.e., low IoU). This erroneous supervision compels the model to misclassify background features as specific foreground classes, disrupting learned representations and accelerating forgetting. To address this, we propose a Quality-guided Min-Cost Max-Flow (Q-MCMF) matcher. To avoid forced assignments, Q-MCMF builds a flow graph and prunes implausible matches based on geometric quality. It then optimizes for the final matching that minimizes cost and maximizes valid assignments. This strategy eliminates harmful supervision from background foregrounding while maximizing foreground learning signals. Extensive experiments on the COCO dataset under various incremental settings demonstrate that our method consistently outperforms existing state-of-the-art approaches.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Mar 2026.

Builds on

23 of 32 references.

References · 23

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2015Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networkscited by 9,617
  3. 2020Deformable DETR: Deformable Transformers for End-to-End Object Detectioncited by 3,410
  4. 2016Learning without Forgettingcited by 2,465
  5. 2021YOLOX: Exceeding YOLO Series in 2021cited by 1,064
  6. 2022DAB-DETR: Dynamic Anchor Boxes are Better Queries for DETRcited by 569
  7. 2019Bridging the Gap Between Anchor-based and Anchor-free Detection via Adaptive Training Sample Selectioncited by 539
  8. 2022DN-DETR: Accelerate DETR Training by Introducing Query DeNoisingcited by 486
  9. 2021Conditional DETR for Fast Training Convergencecited by 422
  10. 2017Incremental Learning of Object Detectors without Catastrophic Forgettingcited by 208
  11. 2020Modeling the Background for Incremental Learning in Semantic Segmentationcited by 189
  12. 2021OTA: Optimal Transport Assignment for Object Detectioncited by 177
11 more
  1. 2022Group DETR: Fast DETR Training with Group-Wise One-to-Many Assignmentcited by 96
  2. 2022Overcoming Catastrophic Forgetting in Incremental Object Detection via Elastic Response Distillationcited by 72
  3. 2024DEIM: DETR with Improved Matching for Fast Convergencecited by 67
  4. 2023Continual Detection Transformer for Incremental Object Detectioncited by 59
  5. 2020SID: Incremental Learning for Anchor-Free Object Detection via Selective and Inter-Related Distillationcited by 32
  6. 2023Augmented Box Replay: Overcoming Foreground Shift for Incremental Object Detectioncited by 32
  7. 2024Bridge Past and Future: Overcoming Information Asymmetry in Incremental Object Detectioncited by 16
  8. 2023MS-DETR: Multispectral Pedestrian Detection Transformer with Loosely Coupled Fusion and Modality-Balanced Optimizationcited by 14
  9. 2025DCA: Dividing and Conquering Amnesia in Incremental Object Detectioncited by 7
  10. 2024Dynamic Object Queries for Transformer-based Incremental Object Detectioncited by 6
  11. 2025Demystifying Catastrophic Forgetting in Two-Stage Incremental Object Detectorcited by 5

Built on by

Not cited yet.