mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

AMDS: Attack-Aware Multi-Stage Defense System for Network Intrusion Detection with Two-Stage Adaptive Weight Learning

arXiv 2603.00859 ↗First posted 1 Mar 2026cs.CR cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Machine learning based network intrusion detection systems are vulnerable to adversarial attacks that degrade classification performance under both gradient-based and distribution shift threat models. Existing defenses typically apply uniform detection strategies, which may not account for heterogeneous attack characteristics. This paper proposes an attack-aware multi-stage defense framework that learns attack-specific detection strategies through a weighted combination of ensemble disagreement, predictive uncertainty, and distributional anomaly signals. Empirical analysis across seven adversarial attack types reveals distinct detection signatures, enabling a two-stage adaptive detection mechanism. Experimental evaluation on a benchmark intrusion detection dataset indicates that the proposed system attains 94.2% area under the receiver operating characteristic curve and improves classification accuracy by 4.5 percentage points and F1-score by 9.0 points over adversarially trained ensembles. Under adaptive white-box attacks with full architectural knowledge, the system appears to maintain 94.4% accuracy with a 4.2% attack success rate, though this evaluation is limited to two adaptive variants and does not constitute a formal robustness guarantee. Cross-dataset validation further suggests that defense effectiveness depends on baseline classifier competence and may vary with feature dimensionality. These results suggest that attack-specific optimization combined with multi-signal integration can provide a practical approach to improving adversarial robustness in machine learning-based intrusion detection systems.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Mar 2026.

Builds on

19 of 41 references.

References · 19

  1. 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,287
  2. 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,326
  3. 2016XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting Systemcited by 5,120
  4. 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,114
  5. 2016Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural Networkscited by 2,976
  6. 2019Theoretically Principled Trade-off between Robustness and Accuracycited by 1,510
  7. 2015DeepFool: a simple and accurate method to fool deep neural networkscited by 1,315
  8. 2018Obfuscated Gradients Give a False Sense of Security: Circumventing Defenses to Adversarial Examplescited by 1,259
  9. 2017Ensemble Adversarial Training: Attacks and Defensescited by 833
  10. 2017Evasion Attacks against Machine Learning at Test Timecited by 686
  11. 2017Feature Squeezing: Detecting Adversarial Examples in Deep Neural Networkscited by 484
  12. 2016Transferability in Machine Learning: from Phenomena to Black-Box Attacks using Adversarial Samplescited by 439
7 more
  1. 2018Characterizing Adversarial Subspaces Using Local Intrinsic Dimensionalitycited by 280
  2. 2017MagNet: a Two-Pronged Defense against Adversarial Examplescited by 268
  3. 2018Adversarial Robustness Toolbox v1.0.0cited by 214
  4. 2017Towards Robust Neural Networks via Random Self-ensemblecited by 158
  5. 2019A Survey of Network-based Intrusion Detection Data Setscited by 46
  6. 2018IDSGAN: Generative Adversarial Networks for Attack Generation against Intrusion Detectioncited by 41
  7. 2019Hardening Random Forest Cyber Detectors Against Adversarial Attackscited by 12

Built on by

Not cited yet.