MO-MIX: Multi-Objective Multi-Agent Cooperative Decision-Making With Deep Reinforcement Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Deep reinforcement learning (RL) has been applied extensively to solve complex decision-making problems. In many real-world scenarios, tasks often have several conflicting objectives and may require multiple agents to cooperate, which are the multi-objective multi-agent decision-making problems. However, only few works have been conducted on this intersection. Existing approaches are limited to separate fields and can only handle multi-agent decision-making with a single objective, or multi-objective decision-making with a single agent. In this paper, we propose MO-MIX to solve the multi-objective multi-agent reinforcement learning (MOMARL) problem. Our approach is based on the centralized training with decentralized execution (CTDE) framework. A weight vector representing preference over the objectives is fed into the decentralized agent network as a condition for local action-value function estimation, while a mixing network with parallel architecture is used to estimate the joint action-value function. In addition, an exploration guide approach is applied to improve the uniformity of the final non-dominated solutions. Experiments demonstrate that the proposed method can effectively solve the multi-objective multi-agent cooperative decision-making problem and generate an approximation of the Pareto set. Our approach not only significantly outperforms the baseline method in all four kinds of evaluation metrics, but also requires less computational cost.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 32 of its 65 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Feb 2026.
Builds on
32 of 65 references.
References · 32
- 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
- 2017Model-Agnostic Meta-Learning for Fast Adaptation of Deep Networkscited by 4,861
- 2014Learning Phrase Representations using RNN Encoder-Decoder for Statistical Machine Translationcited by 4,016
- 2015Continuous control with deep reinforcement learningcited by 3,279
- 2015Trust Region Policy Optimizationcited by 2,503
- 2017Multi-Agent Actor-Critic for Mixed Cooperative-Competitive Environmentscited by 1,519
- 2017Counterfactual Multi-Agent Policy Gradientscited by 733
- 2018QMIX: Monotonic Value Function Factorisation for Deep Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 697
- 2019The StarCraft Multi-Agent Challengecited by 589
- 2015Deep Recurrent Q-Learning for Partially Observable MDPscited by 457
- 2019QTRAN: Learning to Factorize with Transformation for Cooperative Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 372
- 2016Benchmarking Deep Reinforcement Learning for Continuous Controlcited by 361
20 more
- 2018Actor-Attention-Critic for Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 259
- 2017Emergence of Grounded Compositional Language in Multi-Agent Populationscited by 257
- 2014A Survey of Multi-Objective Sequential Decision-Makingcited by 229
- 2020PettingZoo: Gym for Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 209
- 2020Weighted QMIX: Expanding Monotonic Value Function Factorisation for Deep Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 197
- 2015Multiagent Cooperation and Competition with Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 180
- 2019A Generalized Algorithm for Multi-Objective Reinforcement Learning and Policy Adaptationcited by 166
- 2019A Review of Cooperative Multi-Agent Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 147
- 2018Dynamic Weights in Multi-Objective Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 96
- 2016Multi-Objective Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 81
- 2021Rethinking the Implementation Tricks and Monotonicity Constraint in Cooperative Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 68
- 2018Deep Reinforcement Learning For Sequence to Sequence Modelscited by 39
- 2018End-to-end Active Object Tracking and Its Real-world Deployment via Reinforcement Learningcited by 35
- 2017Predicting Head Movement in Panoramic Video: A Deep Reinforcement Learning Approachcited by 34
- 2018Meta-Learning for Multi-objective Reinforcement Learningcited by 33
- 2019Domain Adversarial Reinforcement Learning for Partial Domain Adaptationcited by 16
- 2017Feature Control as Intrinsic Motivation for Hierarchical Reinforcement Learningcited by 15
- 2019Face Hallucination by Attentive Sequence Optimization with Reinforcement Learningcited by 8
- 2021Policy Regularization via Noisy Advantage Values for Cooperative Multi-agent Actor-Critic methodscited by 5
- 2023Intrinsically Motivated Hierarchical Policy Learning in Multi-objective Markov Decision Processescited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 6.
6 papers.
- 2026EraseAnything++: Enabling Concept Erasure in Rectified Flow Transformers Leveraging Multi-Object Optimizationcited by 1
- 2026JAVEDIT: Joint Audio-Visual Instruction-Guided Video Editing with Agentic Data Curationcited by 1
- 2026Agentic Designer: Progressive Multi-Agent Collaboration for Structure-Aware Interior Layout Generationcited by 1
- 2026AI Researchers Must Help Lead Arms Control to Mitigate Military AI Riskscited by 0
- 2026Learning Coordinated Preference for Multi-Objective Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 0
- 2026Robust and Efficient Communication for Multi-Agent Learningcited by 0
- 2026Robust and Efficient Communication for Multi-Agent Learning14 Sep 2026
- 2026Agentic Designer: Progressive Multi-Agent Collaboration for Structure-Aware Interior Layout Generation23 Jul 2026
- 2026Learning Coordinated Preference for Multi-Objective Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning12 Jun 2026
- 2026AI Researchers Must Help Lead Arms Control to Mitigate Military AI Risks10 Jun 2026
- 2026JAVEDIT: Joint Audio-Visual Instruction-Guided Video Editing with Agentic Data Curation2 Jun 2026
- 2026EraseAnything++: Enabling Concept Erasure in Rectified Flow Transformers Leveraging Multi-Object Optimization1 Mar 2026