mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Random Wins All: Rethinking Grouping Strategies for Vision Tokens

arXiv 2603.00486 ↗First posted 28 Feb 2026cs.CVcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Since Transformers are introduced into vision architectures, their quadratic complexity has always been a significant issue that many research efforts aim to address. A representative approach involves grouping tokens, performing self-attention calculations within each group, or pooling the tokens within each group into a single token. To this end, various carefully designed grouping strategies have been proposed to enhance the performance of Vision Transformers. Here, we pose the following questions: Are these carefully designed grouping methods truly necessary? Is there a simpler and more unified token grouping method that can replace these diverse methods? Therefore, we propose the random grouping strategy, which involves a simple and fast random grouping strategy for vision tokens. We validate this approach on multiple baselines, and experiments show that random grouping almost outperforms all other grouping methods. When transferred to downstream tasks, such as object detection, random grouping demonstrates even more pronounced advantages. In response to this phenomenon, we conduct a detailed analysis of the advantages of random grouping from multiple perspectives and identify several crucial elements for the design of grouping strategies: positional information, head feature diversity, global receptive field, and fixed grouping pattern. We demonstrate that as long as these four conditions are met, vision tokens require only an extremely simple grouping strategy to efficiently and effectively handle various visual tasks. We also validate the effectiveness of our proposed random method across multiple modalities, including visual tasks, point cloud processing, and vision-language models. Code will be available at https://github.com/qhfan/random.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 41 of its 50 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Feb 2026.

Builds on

41 of 50 references.

References · 41

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  3. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
  4. 2021Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted Windowscited by 12,082
  5. 2017Mask R-CNNcited by 7,259
  6. 2017mixup: Beyond Empirical Risk Minimizationcited by 5,155
  7. 2020Training data-efficient image transformers & distillation through attentioncited by 4,560
  8. 2023Improved Baselines with Visual Instruction Tuningcited by 4,362
  9. 2022A ConvNet for the 2020scited by 3,545
  10. 2017ScanNet: Richly-annotated 3D Reconstructions of Indoor Scenescited by 3,088
  11. 2019CutMix: Regularization Strategy to Train Strong Classifiers with Localizable Featurescited by 2,875
  12. 2019RandAugment: Practical automated data augmentation with a reduced search spacecited by 2,261
29 more
  1. 2021Pyramid Vision Transformer: A Versatile Backbone for Dense Prediction without Convolutionscited by 1,960
  2. 2019MMDetection: Open MMLab Detection Toolbox and Benchmarkcited by 1,379
  3. 2018Unified Perceptual Parsing for Scene Understandingcited by 1,265
  4. 2017Random Erasing Data Augmentationcited by 1,235
  5. 2021DynamicViT: Efficient Vision Transformers with Dynamic Token Sparsificationcited by 849
  6. 2021Going deeper with Image Transformerscited by 759
  7. 2021PVT v2: Improved Baselines with Pyramid Vision Transformercited by 749
  8. 2019Panoptic Feature Pyramid Networkscited by 644
  9. 2023Point Transformer V3: Simpler, Faster, Strongercited by 579
  10. 2021CSWin Transformer: A General Vision Transformer Backbone with Cross-Shaped Windowscited by 526
  11. 2021Conditional Positional Encodings for Vision Transformerscited by 402
  12. 2022Not All Patches are What You Need: Expediting Vision Transformers via Token Reorganizationscited by 359
  13. 2021CMT: Convolutional Neural Networks Meet Vision Transformerscited by 310
  14. 2022Vision Transformer with Deformable Attentioncited by 293
  15. 2021Focal Self-attention for Local-Global Interactions in Vision Transformerscited by 286
  16. 2022Neighborhood Attention Transformercited by 235
  17. 2022DaViT: Dual Attention Vision Transformerscited by 174
  18. 2023BiFormer: Vision Transformer with Bi-Level Routing Attentioncited by 150
  19. 2021CrossFormer: A Versatile Vision Transformer Hinging on Cross-scale Attentioncited by 139
  20. 2022QuadTree Attention for Vision Transformerscited by 129
  21. 2022EdgeViTs: Competing Light-weight CNNs on Mobile Devices with Vision Transformerscited by 116
  22. 2022HorNet: Efficient High-Order Spatial Interactions with Recursive Gated Convolutionscited by 103
  23. 2022Inception Transformercited by 99
  24. 2022Fast Vision Transformers with HiLo Attentioncited by 78
  25. 2023RMT: Retentive Networks Meet Vision Transformerscited by 68
  26. 2021Lite Vision Transformer with Enhanced Self-Attentioncited by 64
  27. 2022MOAT: Alternating Mobile Convolution and Attention Brings Strong Vision Modelscited by 47
  28. 2022Dual Vision Transformercited by 29
  29. 2022Dynamic Group Transformer: A General Vision Transformer Backbone with Dynamic Group Attentioncited by 14

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026More Accurate, Less Human: Gestalt Grouping in Vision Models
  2. 2024Semantic Equitable Clustering: A Simple and Effective Strategy for Clustering Vision Tokens
  3. 2023Revisiting Token Pruning for Object Detection and Instance Segmentation
  4. 2024GroupMamba: Efficient Group-Based Visual State Space Model
  5. 2026AgilePruner: An Empirical Study of Attention and Diversity for Adaptive Visual Token Pruning in Large Vision-Language Models
  6. 2025GroupCoOp: Group-robust Fine-tuning via Group Prompt Learning
  7. 2023PPT: Token Pruning and Pooling for Efficient Vision Transformers
  8. 2024Exploring Token Pruning in Vision State Space Models