mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

SafeGen-LLM: Enhancing Safety Generalization in Task Planning for Robotic Systems

arXiv 2602.24235 ↗First posted 27 Feb 2026cs.RO cs.AIcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Safety-critical task planning in robotic systems remains challenging: classical planners suffer from poor scalability, Reinforcement Learning (RL)-based methods generalize poorly, and base Large Language Models (LLMs) cannot guarantee safety. To address this gap, we propose safety-generalizable large language models, named SafeGen-LLM. SafeGen-LLM can not only enhance the safety satisfaction of task plans but also generalize well to novel safety properties in various domains. We first construct a multi-domain Planning Domain Definition Language 3 (PDDL3) benchmark with explicit safety constraints. Then, we introduce a two-stage post-training framework: Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT) on a constraint-compliant planning dataset to learn planning syntax and semantics, and Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO) guided by fine-grained reward machines derived from formal verification to enforce safety alignment and by curriculum learning to better handle complex tasks. Extensive experiments show that SafeGen-LLM achieves strong safety generalization and outperforms frontier proprietary baselines across multi-domain planning tasks and multiple input formats (e.g., PDDLs and natural language).

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Feb 2026.

Builds on

16 of 38 references.

References · 16

  1. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,160
  2. 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,084
  3. 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 8,851
  4. 2023QLoRA: Efficient Finetuning of Quantized LLMscited by 3,355
  5. 2022LLM-Planner: Few-Shot Grounded Planning for Embodied Agents with Large Language Modelscited by 459
  6. 2023Generalized Planning in PDDL Domains with Pretrained Large Language Modelscited by 139
  7. 2023ISR-LLM: Iterative Self-Refined Large Language Model for Long-Horizon Sequential Task Planningcited by 77
  8. 2020An empirical investigation of the challenges of real-world reinforcement learningcited by 75
  9. 2017Schema Networks: Zero-shot Transfer with a Generative Causal Model of Intuitive Physicscited by 57
  10. 2023Data-Efficient Learning of Natural Language to Linear Temporal Logic Translators for Robot Task Specificationcited by 38
  11. 2025Large Language Models for Planning: A Comprehensive and Systematic Surveycited by 38
  12. 2024LaMMA-P: Generalizable Multi-Agent Long-Horizon Task Allocation and Planning with LM-Driven PDDL Plannercited by 31
4 more
  1. 2023Neurosymbolic Reinforcement Learning and Planning: A Surveycited by 24
  2. 2022Automaton-Based Representations of Task Knowledge from Generative Language Modelscited by 12
  3. 2024VernaCopter: Disambiguated Natural-Language-Driven Robot via Formal Specificationscited by 4
  4. 2025Language Model as Planner and Formalizer under Constraintscited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Safety Aware Task Planning via Large Language Models in Robotics
  2. 2025SafePlan: Leveraging Formal Logic and Chain-of-Thought Reasoning for Enhanced Safety in LLM-based Robotic Task Planning
  3. 2026Using large language models for embodied planning introduces systematic safety risks
  4. 2025SafeVLA: Towards Safety Alignment of Vision-Language-Action Model via Constrained Learning
  5. 2025Can LLM-Reasoning Models Replace Classical Planning? A Benchmark Study
  6. 2025A Framework for Benchmarking and Aligning Task-Planning Safety in LLM-Based Embodied Agents
  7. 2024Enhancing Safety in Reinforcement Learning with Human Feedback via Rectified Policy Optimization
  8. 2025GSPR: Aligning LLM Safeguards as Generalizable Safety Policy Reasoners