Lap2: Revisiting Laplace DP-SGD for High Dimensions via Majorization Theory
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Differentially Private Stochastic Gradient Descent (DP-SGD) is a cornerstone technique for ensuring privacy in deep learning, widely used in both training from scratch and fine-tuning large-scale language models. While DP-SGD predominantly relies on the Gaussian mechanism, the Laplace mechanism remains underutilized due to its reliance on L1 norm clipping. This constraint severely limits its practicality in high-dimensional models because the L1 norm of an n-dimensional gradient can be up to sqrt(n) times larger than its L2 norm. As a result, the required noise scale grows significantly with model size, leading to poor utility or untrainable models. In this work, we introduce Lap2, a new solution that enables L2 clipping for Laplace DP-SGD while preserving strong privacy guarantees. We overcome the dimensionality-driven clipping barrier by computing coordinate-wise moment bounds and applying majorization theory to construct a tight, data-independent upper bound over the full model. By exploiting the Schur-convexity of the moment accountant function, we aggregate these bounds using a carefully designed majorization set that respects the L2 clipping constraint. This yields a multivariate privacy accountant that scales gracefully with model dimension and enables the use of thousands of moments. Empirical evaluations demonstrate that our approach significantly improves the performance of Laplace DP-SGD, achieving results comparable to or better than Gaussian DP-SGD under strong privacy constraints. For instance, fine-tuning RoBERTa-base (125M parameters) on SST-2 achieves 87.88% accuracy at epsilon=0.54, outperforming Gaussian (87.16%) and standard Laplace (48.97%) under the same budget.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 41 of its 66 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Feb 2026.
Builds on
41 of 66 references.
References · 41
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
- 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,266
- 2018GLUE: A Multi-Task Benchmark and Analysis Platform for Natural Language Understandingcited by 4,854
- 2016Deep Learning with Differential Privacycited by 2,682
- 2018The Secret Sharer: Evaluating and Testing Unintended Memorization in Neural Networkscited by 847
- 2020Inverting Gradients -- How easy is it to break privacy in federated learning?cited by 707
- 2021Large Language Models Can Be Strong Differentially Private Learnerscited by 405
- 2021Differentially Private Fine-tuning of Language Modelscited by 392
- 2021Opacus: User-Friendly Differential Privacy Library in PyTorchcited by 375
- 2021Laplace Redux -- Effortless Bayesian Deep Learningcited by 359
- 2013The Composition Theorem for Differential Privacycited by 290
- 2018Subsampled R'enyi Differential Privacy and Analytical Moments Accountantcited by 234
29 more
- 2022Unlocking High-Accuracy Differentially Private Image Classification through Scalecited by 218
- 2018Improving the Gaussian Mechanism for Differential Privacy: Analytical Calibration and Optimal Denoisingcited by 216
- 2019R'enyi Differential Privacy of the Sampled Gaussian Mechanismcited by 199
- 2021Numerical Composition of Differential Privacycited by 174
- 2020Tempered Sigmoid Activations for Deep Learning with Differential Privacycited by 121
- 2019Updates-Leak: Data Set Inference and Reconstruction Attacks in Online Learningcited by 117
- 2019Hypothesis Testing Interpretations and Renyi Differential Privacycited by 84
- 2022Differentially Private Optimization on Large Model at Small Costcited by 65
- 2023DP-Forward: Fine-tuning and Inference on Language Models with Differential Privacy in Forward Passcited by 65
- 2022Mixed Differential Privacy in Computer Visioncited by 53
- 2022Exploring the Limits of Differentially Private Deep Learning with Group-wise Clippingcited by 52
- 2022TAN Without a Burn: Scaling Laws of DP-SGDcited by 51
- 2022Connect the Dots: Tighter Discrete Approximations of Privacy Loss Distributionscited by 50
- 2022Scalable and Efficient Training of Large Convolutional Neural Networks with Differential Privacycited by 47
- 2022Differentially Private Bias-Term Fine-tuning of Foundation Modelscited by 47
- 2021Fast and Memory Efficient Differentially Private-SGD via JL Projectionscited by 29
- 2023ViP: A Differentially Private Foundation Model for Computer Visioncited by 17
- 2018The Bounded Laplace Mechanism in Differential Privacycited by 13
- 2020Sharp Composition Bounds for Gaussian Differential Privacy via Edgeworth Expansioncited by 13
- 2023Differentially Private SGD Without Clipping Bias: An Error-Feedback Approachcited by 13
- 2023Differentially Private Video Activity Recognitioncited by 9
- 2023DPSUR: Accelerating Differentially Private Stochastic Gradient Descent Using Selective Update and Releasecited by 9
- 2023DP-Adam: Correcting DP Bias in Adam's Second Moment Estimationcited by 8
- 2023Model Inversion Attack via Dynamic Memory Learningcited by 6
- 2024Clip Body and Tail Separately: High Probability Guarantees for DPSGD with Heavy Tailscited by 4
- 2023Differential Privacy with Higher Utility by Exploiting Coordinate-wise Disparity: Laplace Mechanism Can Beat Gaussian in High Dimensionscited by 3
- 2023Online Sensitivity Optimization in Differentially Private Learningcited by 2
- 2025PLRV-O: Advancing Differentially Private Deep Learning via Privacy Loss Random Variable Optimizationcited by 1
- 2025Privacy Loss of Noise Perturbation via Concentration Analysis of A Product Measurecited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.