Closing the gap on tabular data with Fourier and Implicit Categorical Features
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
While Deep Learning has demonstrated impressive results in applications on various data types, it continues to lag behind tree-based methods when applied to tabular data, often referred to as the last "unconquered castle" for neural networks. We hypothesize that a significant advantage of tree-based methods lies in their intrinsic capability to model and exploit non-linear interactions induced by features with categorical characteristics. In contrast, neural-based methods exhibit biases toward uniform numerical processing of features and smooth solutions, making it challenging for them to effectively leverage such patterns. We address this performance gap by using statistical-based feature processing techniques to identify features that are strongly correlated with the target once discretized. We further mitigate the bias of deep models for overly-smooth solutions, a bias that does not align with the inherent properties of the data, using Learned Fourier. We show that our proposed feature preprocessing significantly boosts the performance of deep learning models and enables them to achieve a performance that closely matches or surpasses XGBoost on a comprehensive tabular data benchmark.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Feb 2026.
Builds on
22 of 35 references.
References · 22
- 2016XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting Systemcited by 5,166
- 2020Fourier Features Let Networks Learn High Frequency Functions in Low Dimensional Domainscited by 2,200
- 2021Deep Reinforcement Learning at the Edge of the Statistical Precipicecited by 807
- 2022TabPFN: A Transformer That Solves Small Tabular Classification Problems in a Secondcited by 674
- 2019TabNet: Attentive Interpretable Tabular Learningcited by 648
- 2021Tabular Data: Deep Learning is Not All You Needcited by 535
- 2021Deep Neural Networks and Tabular Data: A Surveycited by 491
- 2020TabTransformer: Tabular Data Modeling Using Contextual Embeddingscited by 409
- 2021SAINT: Improved Neural Networks for Tabular Data via Row Attention and Contrastive Pre-Trainingcited by 319
- 2023When Do Neural Nets Outperform Boosted Trees on Tabular Data?cited by 223
- 2019Neural Oblivious Decision Ensembles for Deep Learning on Tabular Datacited by 203
- 2022Why do tree-based models still outperform deep learning on tabular data?cited by 199
10 more
- 2022On Embeddings for Numerical Features in Tabular Deep Learningcited by 186
- 2021SCARF: Self-Supervised Contrastive Learning using Random Feature Corruptioncited by 156
- 2021Well-tuned Simple Nets Excel on Tabular Datasetscited by 151
- 2022Transfer Learning with Deep Tabular Modelscited by 52
- 2020HOLMES: Health OnLine Model Ensemble Serving for Deep Learning Models in Intensive Care Unitscited by 45
- 2021Boost then Convolve: Gradient Boosting Meets Graph Neural Networkscited by 44
- 2022Overcoming the Spectral Bias of Neural Value Approximationcited by 19
- 2022Hopular: Modern Hopfield Networks for Tabular Datacited by 18
- 2021Functional Regularization for Reinforcement Learning via Learned Fourier Featurescited by 17
- 2021XBNet : An Extremely Boosted Neural Networkcited by 5
Built on by
Not cited yet.