mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Tackling Privacy Heterogeneity in Differentially Private Federated Learning

arXiv 2602.22633 ↗First posted 26 Feb 2026cs.LG cs.DCcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Differentially private federated learning (DP-FL) enables clients to collaboratively train machine learning models while preserving the privacy of their local data. However, most existing DP-FL approaches assume that all clients share a uniform privacy budget, an assumption that does not hold in real-world scenarios where privacy requirements vary widely. This privacy heterogeneity poses a significant challenge: conventional client selection strategies, which typically rely on data quantity, cannot distinguish between clients providing high-quality updates and those introducing substantial noise due to strict privacy constraints. To address this gap, we present the first systematic study of privacy-aware client selection in DP-FL. We establish a theoretical foundation by deriving a convergence analysis that quantifies the impact of privacy heterogeneity on training error. Building on this analysis, we propose a privacy-aware client selection strategy, formulated as a convex optimization problem, that adaptively adjusts selection probabilities to minimize training error. Extensive experiments on benchmark datasets demonstrate that our approach achieves up to a 10% improvement in test accuracy on CIFAR-10 compared to existing baselines under heterogeneous privacy budgets. These results highlight the importance of incorporating privacy heterogeneity into client selection for practical and effective federated learning.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 37 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Feb 2026.

Builds on

21 of 37 references.

References · 21

  1. 2016Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Datacited by 7,669
  2. 2017Fashion-MNIST: a Novel Image Dataset for Benchmarking Machine Learning Algorithmscited by 4,349
  3. 2016Deep Learning with Differential Privacycited by 2,728
  4. 2019Federated Learning: Challenges, Methods, and Future Directionscited by 1,538
  5. 2019On the Convergence of FedAvg on Non-IID Datacited by 1,229
  6. 2016Optimization Methods for Large-Scale Machine Learningcited by 1,150
  7. 2019Deep Leakage from Gradientscited by 1,021
  8. 2016CVXPY: A Python-Embedded Modeling Language for Convex Optimizationcited by 641
  9. 2018Local SGD Converges Fast and Communicates Littlecited by 605
  10. 2019Differential Privacy Has Disparate Impact on Model Accuracycited by 316
  11. 2013The Composition Theorem for Differential Privacycited by 297
  12. 2018Privacy Amplification by Subsampling: Tight Analyses via Couplings and Divergencescited by 242
9 more
  1. 2020Differentially Private Learning Needs Better Features (or Much More Data)cited by 235
  2. 2022Automatic Clipping: Differentially Private Deep Learning Made Easier and Strongercited by 88
  3. 2021Understanding Clipping for Federated Learning: Convergence and Client-Level Differential Privacycited by 69
  4. 2020LDP-FL: Practical Private Aggregation in Federated Learning with Local Differential Privacycited by 64
  5. 2020Bandit-based Communication-Efficient Client Selection Strategies for Federated Learningcited by 29
  6. 2022Personalization Improves Privacy-Accuracy Tradeoffs in Federated Learningcited by 23
  7. 2020Voting-based Approaches For Differentially Private Federated Learningcited by 14
  8. 2024Adaptive Heterogeneous Client Sampling for Federated Learning over Wireless Networkscited by 9
  9. 2024Locally Differentially Private Online Federated Learning With Correlated Noisecited by 6

Built on by

Not cited yet.