Mitigating Membership Inference in Intermediate Representations with Differentially Private Training
On the map: LLM safety and security → Membership inference attacks
Abstract (arXiv)
In Embedding-as-an-Interface (EaaI) settings, pre-trained models are queried for Intermediate Representations (IRs). The distributional properties of IRs can leak training-set membership signals, enabling Membership Inference Attacks (MIAs) whose strength varies across layers. Although Differentially Private Stochastic Gradient Descent (DP-SGD) mitigates such leakage, existing implementations employ per-example gradient clipping and a uniform, layer-agnostic noise multiplier, ignoring heterogeneous layer-wise MIA vulnerability. This paper introduces Layer-wise MIA-risk-aware DP-SGD (LM-DP-SGD), which adaptively allocates privacy protection across layers in proportion to their MIA risk. Specifically, LM-DP-SGD trains a shadow model on a public shadow dataset, extracts per-layer IRs from its train/test splits, and fits layer-specific MIA adversaries, using their attack error rates as MIA-risk estimates. Leveraging the cross-dataset transferability of MIAs, these estimates are then used to reweight each layer's contribution to the globally clipped gradient during private training, providing layer-appropriate protection under a fixed noise magnitude. We further establish theoretical guarantees on both privacy and convergence of LM-DP-SGD. Extensive experiments show that, under the same privacy budget, LM-DP-SGD reduces the peak IR-level MIA risk while preserving utility, yielding a superior privacy-utility trade-off.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Membership inference attacks, one of 12 directions in LLM safety and security. Builds on 25 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Feb 2026.
Builds on
25 of 35 references.
Closest ancestors · 1
Same direction, newest first
Other references · 24
- 2019Parameter-Efficient Transfer Learning for NLPcited by 4,195
- 2017Progressive Growing of GANs for Improved Quality, Stability, and Variationcited by 2,967
- 2016Deep Learning with Differential Privacycited by 2,682
- 2021BEIR: A Heterogenous Benchmark for Zero-shot Evaluation of Information Retrieval Modelscited by 1,225
- 2022MTEB: Massive Text Embedding Benchmarkcited by 623
- 2018ML-Leaks: Model and Data Independent Membership Inference Attacks and Defenses on Machine Learning Modelscited by 475
- 2019A Comprehensive Overhaul of Feature Distillationcited by 341
- 2019Differential Privacy Has Disparate Impact on Model Accuracycited by 316
- 2013The Composition Theorem for Differential Privacycited by 290
- 2020Systematic Evaluation of Privacy Risks of Machine Learning Modelscited by 273
- 2018Subsampled R'enyi Differential Privacy and Analytical Moments Accountantcited by 234
- 2021A Geometric Analysis of Neural Collapse with Unconstrained Featurescited by 226
12 more
- 2019Differentially Private Learning with Adaptive Clippingcited by 218
- 2024ReFT: Representation Finetuning for Language Modelscited by 186
- 2020Tempered Sigmoid Activations for Deep Learning with Differential Privacycited by 121
- 2022Automatic Clipping: Differentially Private Deep Learning Made Easier and Strongercited by 87
- 2019AdaCliP: Adaptive Clipping for Private SGDcited by 77
- 2023Can Neural Network Memorization Be Localized?cited by 66
- 2022Mixed Differential Privacy in Computer Visioncited by 53
- 2022Exploring the Limits of Differentially Private Deep Learning with Group-wise Clippingcited by 52
- 2022Normalized/Clipped SGD with Perturbation for Differentially Private Non-Convex Optimizationcited by 35
- 2022Differentially Private Learning with Per-Sample Adaptive Clippingcited by 21
- 2023Function-Consistent Feature Distillationcited by 21
- 2024Localizing Memorization in SSL Vision Encoderscited by 9
Built on by
Not cited yet.