mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

RAIN-Merging: A Gradient-Free Method to Enhance Instruction Following in Large Reasoning Models with Preserved Thinking Format

arXiv 2602.22538 ↗First posted 26 Feb 2026cs.LG cs.CLcited by 9

On the map: LLM reasoning → Test-time compute and efficient thinking

Abstract (arXiv)

Large reasoning models (LRMs) excel at a long chain of reasoning but often fail to faithfully follow instructions regarding output format, constraints, or specific requirements. We investigate whether this gap can be closed by integrating an instruction-tuned model (ITM) into an LRM. Analyzing their differences in parameter space, namely task vectors, we find that their principal subspaces are nearly orthogonal across key modules, suggesting a lightweight merging with minimal interference. However, we also demonstrate that naive merges are fragile because they overlook the output format mismatch between LRMs (with explicit thinking and response segments) and ITMs (answers-only). We introduce RAIN-Merging (Reasoning-Aware Instruction-attention guided Null-space projection Merging), a gradient-free method that integrates instruction following while preserving thinking format and reasoning performance. First, with a small reasoning calibration set, we project the ITM task vector onto the null space of forward features at thinking special tokens, which preserves the LRM's structured reasoning mechanisms. Second, using a small instruction calibration set, we estimate instruction attention to derive module-specific scaling that amplifies instruction-relevant components and suppresses leakage. Across four instruction-following benchmarks and nine reasoning & general capability benchmarks, RAIN-Merging substantially improves instruction adherence while maintaining reasoning quality. The gains are consistent across model scales and architectures, translating to improved performance in agent settings.

Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Test-time compute and efficient thinking, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 28 of its 78 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Feb 2026.

Builds on

28 of 78 references.

Closest ancestors · 2

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025Activation-Guided Consensus Merging for Large Language Models20 May
  2. 2025Unlocking Efficient Long-to-Short LLM Reasoning with Model Merging26 Mar

Other references · 26

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
  2. 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 10,109
  3. 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 9,379
  4. 2021Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Datasetcited by 5,371
  5. 2024OpenAI o1 System Cardcited by 1,244
  6. 2023Instruction-Following Evaluation for Large Language Modelscited by 1,228
  7. 2024DeepSeek-Coder: When the Large Language Model Meets Programming -- The Rise of Code Intelligencecited by 1,181
  8. 2024Qwen2.5-Math Technical Report: Toward Mathematical Expert Model via Self-Improvementcited by 1,090
  9. 2022Program of Thoughts Prompting: Disentangling Computation from Reasoning for Numerical Reasoning Taskscited by 1,076
  10. 2024From Crowdsourced Data to High-Quality Benchmarks: Arena-Hard and BenchBuilder Pipelinecited by 500
  11. 2025MathArena: Evaluating LLMs on Uncontaminated Math Competitionscited by 297
  12. 2024Model Merging in LLMs, MLLMs, and Beyond: Methods, Theories, Applications and Opportunitiescited by 254
14 more
  1. 2024Arcee's MergeKit: A Toolkit for Merging Large Language Modelscited by 194
  2. 2025RL's Razor: Why Online Reinforcement Learning Forgets Lesscited by 176
  3. 2024Revolutionizing Finance with LLMs: An Overview of Applications and Insightscited by 90
  4. 2025When Thinking Fails: The Pitfalls of Reasoning for Instruction-Following in LLMscited by 53
  5. 2025AGENTIF: Benchmarking Instruction Following of Large Language Models in Agentic Scenarioscited by 49
  6. 2025LLMs are Greedy Agents: Effects of RL Fine-tuning on Decision-Making Abilitiescited by 41
  7. 2025Activation-Informed Merging of Large Language Modelscited by 30
  8. 2025Scaling Reasoning, Losing Control: Evaluating Instruction Following in Large Reasoning Modelscited by 28
  9. 2025Incentivizing Reasoning for Advanced Instruction-Following of Large Language Modelscited by 17
  10. 2025Put the Space of LoRA Initialization to the Extreme to Preserve Pre-trained Knowledgecited by 16
  11. 2025Joint Evaluation of Answer and Reasoning Consistency for Hallucination Detection in Large Reasoning Modelscited by 14
  12. 2024Step Guided Reasoning: Improving Mathematical Reasoning using Guidance Generation and Step Reasoningcited by 9
  13. 2025Instruction Following by Principled Boosting Attention of Large Language Modelscited by 9
  14. 2025LEWIS (LayEr WIse Sparsity) -- A Training Free Guided Model Merging Approachcited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 9.

9 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Effectively Controlling Reasoning Models through Thinking Intervention
  2. 2025Big Reasoning with Small Models: Instruction Retrieval at Inference Time
  3. 2025ReasonIF: Large Reasoning Models Fail to Follow Instructions During Reasoning
  4. 2025From Long to Short: LLMs Excel at Trimming Own Reasoning Chains
  5. 2026Free(): Learning to Forget in Malloc-Only Reasoning Models
  6. 2024Dual Instruction Tuning with Large Language Models for Mathematical Reasoning
  7. 2026Reasoning-Trace Collapse: Evaluating the Loss of Explicit Reasoning During Fine-Tuning
  8. 2026Post-Reasoning: Improving the Performance of Non-Thinking Models at No Cost