EditFlow: Benchmarking and Optimizing Code Edit Recommendation Systems via Reconstruction of Developer Flows
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Large language models (LLMs) for code editing have achieved remarkable progress, yet recent empirical studies reveal a fundamental disconnect between technical accuracy and developer productivity. Despite their strong benchmark performance, developers complete tasks 19% slower when using AI assistance, with over 68.81% of recommendations disrupting their mental flow. This misalignment stems from the use of static commit snapshots that lack temporal information, causing models to optimize for end results rather than the incremental, context-sensitive steps that align with developers' natural reasoning process. To bridge this gap, we present EditFlow, which benchmarks and optimizes subsequent code edit recommendation systems through the reconstruction of developer editing flows. EditFlow addresses three key challenges. First, collecting edit-order data that reflects developers' flow is inherently difficult: manual annotation introduces prohibitive overhead, while development logs capture only single trajectories instead of all plausible editing flows. Second, benchmarking recommendation performance against developers' ongoing editing flow requires a digital-twin-like simulation that can faithfully simulate the editing process. Third, existing heterogeneous systems vary drastically in scale and architecture, posing challenges for developing a unified optimization strategy that endows all models with mental-flow awareness regardless of design or capability. ......
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 25 Feb 2026.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Diff Diffusion: Predicting Edit Paths with Diffusion Models for Efficient Code Editing
- 2026SWE-Edit: Rethinking Code Editing for Efficient SWE-Agent
- 2026SAFEdit: Does Multi-Agent Decomposition Resolve the Reliability Challenges of Instructed Code Editing?
- 2025AgentPack: A Dataset of Code Changes, Co-Authored by Agents and Humans
- 2026From Code Review to Code Critique: Intent, Drift, and Spotlight for AI-Generated Diffs at Scale
- 2026RAG-Reflect: Agentic Retrieval-Augmented Generation with Reflections for Comment-Driven Code Maintenance on Stack Overflow
- 2025Large Language Model Critics for Execution-Free Evaluation of Code Changes
- 2026When Models Edit Too Much: On the Fidelity of Minimal Code Edits