mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

A General Equilibrium Theory of Orchestrated AI Agent Systems

arXiv 2602.21255 ↗First posted 23 Feb 2026cs.GT cs.AI math.OCcited by 0

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Social simulation and multi-agent debate

Abstract (arXiv)

We establish a general equilibrium theory for systems of large language model (LLM) agents operating under centralized orchestration. The framework is a production economy in the sense of Arrow-Debreu (1954), extended to infinite-dimensional commodity spaces following Bewley (1972). Each LLM agent is modeled as a firm whose production set Y a subset H = L 2 ([0, T ], R R ) represents the feasible metric trajectories determined by its frozen model weights. The orchestrator is the consumer, choosing a routing policy over the agent DAG to maximize system welfare subject to a budget constraint evaluated at functional prices p ∈ H A . These prices-elements of the Hilbert dual of the commodity space-assign a shadow value to each metric of each agent at each instant. We prove, via Brouwer's theorem applied to a finitedimensional approximation V K subset H, that every such economy admits at least one general equilibrium (p * , y * , π * ). A functional Walras' law holds as a theorem: the value of functional excess demand is zero for all prices, as a consequence of the consumer's budget constraint-not by construction. We further establish Pareto optimality (First Welfare Theorem), decentralizability of Pareto optima (Second Welfare Theorem), and uniqueness with geometric convergence under a contraction condition (Banach). The orchestration dynamics constitute a Walrasian tatonnement that converges globally under the contraction condition, unlike classical tatonnement (Scarf, 1960). The framework admits a DSGE interpretation with SLO parameters as policy rates.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Social simulation and multi-agent debate, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 4 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Feb 2026.

Builds on

4 of 33 references.

References · 4

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2020Fourier Neural Operator for Parametric Partial Differential Equationscited by 2,908
  3. 2023AutoGen: Enabling Next-Gen LLM Applications via Multi-Agent Conversationcited by 1,988
  4. 2015Multivariate Functional Principal Component Analysis for Data Observed on Different (Dimensional) Domainscited by 32

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Information Limits and Attractor Dynamics in Economies of Frontier LLM Agents: A Pre-Registered Test
  2. 2026Competitive Market Behavior of LLMs
  3. 2026Agentic Hives: Equilibrium, Indeterminacy, and Endogenous Cycles in Self-Organizing Multi-Agent Systems
  4. 2026Economy of Minds: Emerging Multi-Agent Intelligence with Economic Interactions
  5. 2026CoffeeBench: Benchmarking Long-Horizon LLM Agents in Heterogeneous Multi-Agent Economies
  6. 2025Aligning Large Language Model Agents with Rational and Moral Preferences: A Supervised Fine-Tuning Approach
  7. 2026Markets, Not Planners: Decentralized Orchestration of LLM Agents with Private Information
  8. 2026Token Economics for LLM Agents: A Dual-View Study from Computing and Economics