Position: Stop Preaching and Start Practising Data Frugality for Responsible Development of AI
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
This position paper argues that the machine learning community must move from preaching to practising data frugality for responsible artificial intelligence (AI) development. For too long, progress has been equated with ever-larger datasets, driving remarkable advances but now yielding increasingly diminishing performance gains alongside rising energy use and carbon emissions. While awareness of data frugal approaches has grown, their adoption has remained rhetorical, and data scaling continues to dominate development practice. We argue that this gap between preach and practice must be closed, as continued data scaling entails substantial and under-accounted environmental impacts. To ground our position, we provide indicative estimates of the energy use and carbon emissions associated with the downstream use of ImageNet-1K. We then present empirical evidence that data frugality is both practical and beneficial, demonstrating that subset selection methods can substantially reduce training energy consumption with little loss in accuracy, while also mitigating dataset bias. Finally, we outline actionable recommendations for moving data frugality from rhetorical preaching to concrete practice for responsible development of AI.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 69 of its 109 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Feb 2026.
Builds on
69 of 109 references.
References · 69
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
- 2021Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted Windowscited by 12,139
- 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,498
- 2020Scaling Laws for Neural Language Modelscited by 6,586
- 2017Understanding Black-box Predictions via Influence Functionscited by 1,741
- 2018Datasheets for Datasetscited by 1,386
- 2021Deduplicating Training Data Makes Language Models Bettercited by 714
- 2018An Empirical Study of Example Forgetting during Deep Neural Network Learningcited by 678
- 2023BridgeData V2: A Dataset for Robot Learning at Scalecited by 657
- 2021Deep Learning on a Data Diet: Finding Important Examples Early in Trainingcited by 533
- 2022Beyond neural scaling laws: beating power law scaling via data pruningcited by 528
- 2020Dataset Condensation with Gradient Matchingcited by 516
38 more
- 2020What Neural Networks Memorize and Why: Discovering the Long Tail via Influence Estimationcited by 497
- 2024Dolma: an Open Corpus of Three Trillion Tokens for Language Model Pretraining Researchcited by 483
- 2023Scaling Data-Constrained Language Modelscited by 403
- 2021ResNet strikes back: An improved training procedure in timmcited by 368
- 2019Selection via Proxy: Efficient Data Selection for Deep Learningcited by 339
- 2018Not All Samples Are Created Equal: Deep Learning with Importance Samplingcited by 328
- 2020Pretrained Transformers Improve Out-of-Distribution Robustnesscited by 294
- 2021GRAD-MATCH: Gradient Matching based Data Subset Selection for Efficient Deep Model Trainingcited by 274
- 2022Estimating the Carbon Footprint of BLOOM, a 176B Parameter Language Modelcited by 265
- 2020Towards the Systematic Reporting of the Energy and Carbon Footprints of Machine Learningcited by 249
- 2020Large image datasets: A pyrrhic win for computer vision?cited by 237
- 2021Dataset Distillation with Infinitely Wide Convolutional Networkscited by 218
- 2023Power Hungry Processing: Watts Driving the Cost of AI Deployment?cited by 191
- 2022Scaling Up Dataset Distillation to ImageNet-1K with Constant Memorycited by 181
- 2021The Values Encoded in Machine Learning Researchcited by 172
- 2023D4: Improving LLM Pretraining via Document De-Duplication and Diversificationcited by 150
- 2023Squeeze, Recover and Relabel: Dataset Condensation at ImageNet Scale From A New Perspectivecited by 138
- 2017The Devil is in the Tails: Fine-grained Classification in the Wildcited by 89
- 2018On Coresets for Logistic Regressioncited by 67
- 2020The De-democratization of AI: Deep Learning and the Compute Divide in Artificial Intelligence Researchcited by 67
- 2023Large-scale Dataset Pruning with Dynamic Uncertaintycited by 63
- 2024Does equivariance matter at scale?cited by 52
- 2023Towards Sustainable Learning: Coresets for Data-efficient Deep Learningcited by 44
- 2019Sparse Variational Inference: Bayesian Coresets from Scratchcited by 28
- 2025DataMIL: Selecting Data for Robot Imitation Learning with Datamodelscited by 28
- 2025A Coreset Selection of Coreset Selection Literature: Introduction and Recent Advancescited by 28
- 2022Data-Centric Green AI: An Exploratory Empirical Studycited by 25
- 2021Core-set Sampling for Efficient Neural Architecture Searchcited by 23
- 2025From Efficiency Gains to Rebound Effects: The Problem of Jevons' Paradox in AI's Polarized Environmental Debatecited by 23
- 2022AUTOMATA: Gradient Based Data Subset Selection for Compute-Efficient Hyper-parameter Tuningcited by 22
- 2018Deep Active Learning with a Neural Architecture Searchcited by 17
- 2022BERT on a Data Diet: Finding Important Examples by Gradient-Based Pruningcited by 17
- 2025Position: The Most Expensive Part of an LLM should be its Training Datacited by 16
- 2022Data Representativity for Machine Learning and AI Systemscited by 15
- 2025Data Pruning by Information Maximizationcited by 15
- 2015Strong Coresets for Hard and Soft Bregman Clustering with Applications to Exponential Family Mixturescited by 12
- 2023Efficiency is Not Enough: A Critical Perspective of Environmentally Sustainable AIcited by 12
- 2021Frugal Machine Learningcited by 11
50 most cited of 69 All 69 (JSON)
Built on by
Not cited yet.