Goal-Oriented Influence-Maximizing Data Acquisition for Learning and Optimization
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Active data acquisition is central to many learning and optimization tasks in deep neural networks, yet remains challenging because most approaches rely on predictive uncertainty estimates that are difficult to obtain reliably. To this end, we propose Goal-Oriented Influence- Maximizing Data Acquisition (GOIMDA), an active acquisition algorithm that avoids explicit posterior inference while remaining uncertainty-aware through inverse curvature. GOIMDA selects inputs by maximizing their expected influence on a user-specified goal functional, such as test loss, predictive entropy, or the value of an optimizer-recommended design. Leveraging first-order influence functions, we derive a tractable acquisition rule that combines the goal gradient, training-loss curvature, and candidate sensitivity to model parameters. We show theoretically that, for generalized linear models, GOIMDA approximates predictive-entropy minimization up to a correction term accounting for goal alignment and prediction bias, thereby, yielding uncertainty-aware behavior without maintaining a Bayesian posterior. Empirically, across learning tasks (including image and text classification) and optimization tasks (including noisy global optimization benchmarks and neural-network hyperparameter tuning), GOIMDA consistently reaches target performance with substantially fewer labeled samples or function evaluations than uncertainty-based active learning and Gaussian-process Bayesian optimization baselines.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 65 of its 128 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Feb 2026.
Builds on
65 of 128 references.
References · 65
- 2017On Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 4,860
- 2015Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 4,416
- 2016Simple and Scalable Predictive Uncertainty Estimation using Deep Ensemblescited by 3,888
- 2016Identity Mappings in Deep Residual Networkscited by 1,960
- 2017Understanding Black-box Predictions via Influence Functionscited by 1,714
- 2020A Review of Uncertainty Quantification in Deep Learning: Techniques, Applications and Challengescited by 813
- 2017Deep Bayesian Active Learning with Image Datacited by 812
- 2018A Tutorial on Bayesian Optimizationcited by 734
- 2019Deep Batch Active Learning by Diverse, Uncertain Gradient Lower Boundscited by 602
- 2020A Survey of Deep Active Learningcited by 547
- 2020What Neural Networks Memorize and Why: Discovering the Long Tail via Influence Estimationcited by 492
- 2019Deep Ensembles: A Loss Landscape Perspectivecited by 438
38 more
- 2019BatchBALD: Efficient and Diverse Batch Acquisition for Deep Bayesian Active Learningcited by 428
- 2019Scalable Global Optimization via Local Bayesian Optimizationcited by 359
- 2015Scalable Bayesian Optimization Using Deep Neural Networkscited by 284
- 2019Variational Adversarial Active Learningcited by 284
- 2020Influence Functions in Deep Learning Are Fragilecited by 247
- 2017EMNIST: an extension of MNIST to handwritten letterscited by 212
- 2017Max-value Entropy Search for Efficient Bayesian Optimizationcited by 202
- 2017Cost-Effective Active Learning for Deep Image Classificationcited by 165
- 2019On the Accuracy of Influence Functions for Measuring Group Effectscited by 146
- 2017Suggestive Annotation: A Deep Active Learning Framework for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 145
- 2020Explaining Black Box Predictions and Unveiling Data Artifacts through Influence Functionscited by 144
- 2021Batch Active Learning at Scalecited by 127
- 2020FastIF: Scalable Influence Functions for Efficient Model Interpretation and Debuggingcited by 120
- 2017Batched Large-scale Bayesian Optimization in High-dimensional Spacescited by 116
- 2019Deep Active Learning: Unified and Principled Method for Query and Trainingcited by 92
- 2019Practical Multi-fidelity Bayesian Optimization for Hyperparameter Tuningcited by 91
- 2018Deep Bayesian Active Learning for Natural Language Processing: Results of a Large-Scale Empirical Studycited by 90
- 2018Understanding the Origins of Bias in Word Embeddingscited by 90
- 2019Diverse mini-batch Active Learningcited by 88
- 2021Gone Fishing: Neural Active Learning with Fisher Embeddingscited by 88
- 2020Scalable Constrained Bayesian Optimizationcited by 84
- 2021Influence Selection for Active Learningcited by 82
- 2019On Second-Order Group Influence Functions for Black-Box Predictionscited by 78
- 2021A survey on high-dimensional Gaussian process modeling with application to Bayesian optimizationcited by 76
- 2022Recent Advances in Bayesian Optimizationcited by 74
- 2016The Parallel Knowledge Gradient Method for Batch Bayesian Optimizationcited by 73
- 2022Active Learning by Feature Mixingcited by 63
- 2018BOCK : Bayesian Optimization with Cylindrical Kernelscited by 62
- 2023Prediction-Oriented Bayesian Active Learningcited by 60
- 2019Bayesian Generative Active Deep Learningcited by 57
- 2021Active Learning for Domain Adaptation: An Energy-Based Approachcited by 53
- 2024A Survey on Deep Active Learning: Recent Advances and New Frontierscited by 53
- 2020A Survey of Active Learning for Text Classification using Deep Neural Networkscited by 50
- 2021Semi-Supervised Active Learning with Temporal Output Discrepancycited by 50
- 2023A Study of Bayesian Neural Network Surrogates for Bayesian Optimizationcited by 50
- 2017Covariances, Robustness, and Variational Bayescited by 39
- 2020Discriminative Jackknife: Quantifying Uncertainty in Deep Learning via Higher-Order Influence Functionscited by 34
- 2020Deep Active Learning for Biased Datasets via Fisher Kernel Self-Supervisioncited by 32
50 most cited of 65 All 65 (JSON)
Built on by
Not cited yet.