mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

An interpretable framework using foundation models for fish sex identification

arXiv 2602.19022 ↗First posted 22 Feb 2026cs.CV cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Accurate sex identification in fish is vital for optimizing breeding and management strategies in aquaculture, particularly for species at the risk of extinction. However, most existing methods are invasive or stressful and may cause additional mortality, posing severe risks to threatened or endangered fish populations. To address these challenges, we propose FishProtoNet, a robust, non-invasive computer vision-based framework for sex identification of delta smelt (Hypomesus transpacificus), an endangered fish species native to California, across its full life cycle. Unlike the traditional deep learning methods, FishProtoNet provides interpretability through learned prototype representations while improving robustness by leveraging foundation models to reduce the influence of background noise. Specifically, the FishProtoNet framework consists of three key components: fish regions of interest (ROIs) extraction using visual foundation model, feature extraction from fish ROIs and fish sex identification based on an interpretable prototype network. FishProtoNet demonstrates strong performance in delta smelt sex identification during early spawning and post-spawning stages, achieving the accuracies of 74.40% and 81.16% and corresponding F1 scores of 74.27% and 79.43% respectively. In contrast, delta smelt sex identification at the subadult stage remains challenging for current computer vision methods, likely due to less pronounced morphological differences in immature fish. The source code of FishProtoNet is publicly available at: https://github.com/zhengmiao1/Fish_sex_identification

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Feb 2026.

Builds on

12 of 30 references.

References · 12

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
  3. 2015Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networkscited by 9,617
  4. 2023Segment Anythingcited by 8,158
  5. 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,690
  6. 2022A ConvNet for the 2020scited by 3,545
  7. 2023Grounding DINO: Marrying DINO with Grounded Pre-Training for Open-Set Object Detectioncited by 3,274
  8. 2017Random Erasing Data Augmentationcited by 1,235
  9. 2020Neural Prototype Trees for Interpretable Fine-grained Image Recognitioncited by 213
  10. 2018Robust Classification with Convolutional Prototype Learningcited by 122
  11. 2021How can I choose an explainer? An Application-grounded Evaluation of Post-hoc Explanationscited by 58
  12. 2022Post-Hoc Explanations Fail to Achieve their Purpose in Adversarial Contextscited by 53

Built on by

Not cited yet.