From "Help" to Helpful: A Hierarchical Assessment of LLMs in Mental e-Health Applications
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Psychosocial online counselling frequently encounters generic subject lines that impede efficient case prioritisation. This study evaluates eleven large language models generating six-word subject lines for German counselling emails through hierarchical assessment - first categorising outputs, then ranking within categories to enable manageable evaluation. Nine assessors (counselling professionals and AI systems) enable analysis via Krippendorff's α, Spearman's ρ, Pearson's r and Kendall's τ. Results reveal performance trade-offs between proprietary services and privacy-preserving open-source alternatives, with German fine-tuning consistently improving performance. The study addresses critical ethical considerations for mental health AI deployment including privacy, bias and accountability.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Jan 2026.
Builds on
16 of 40 references.
References · 16
- 2019BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTcited by 5,462
- 2023G-Eval: NLG Evaluation using GPT-4 with Better Human Alignmentcited by 2,205
- 2023Benchmarking Large Language Models for News Summarizationcited by 444
- 2023Human-like Summarization Evaluation with ChatGPTcited by 126
- 2023LLM Comparative Assessment: Zero-shot NLG Evaluation through Pairwise Comparisons using Large Language Modelscited by 66
- 2024A Framework for Human Evaluation of Large Language Models in Healthcare Derived from Literature Reviewcited by 65
- 2024A Computational Framework for Behavioral Assessment of LLM Therapistscited by 61
- 2019This Email Could Save Your Life: Introducing the Task of Email Subject Line Generationcited by 58
- 2024A Systematic Survey of Text Summarization: From Statistical Methods to Large Language Modelscited by 52
- 2023ChatCounselor: A Large Language Models for Mental Health Supportcited by 44
- 2023Is GPT-4 a reliable rater? Evaluating Consistency in GPT-4 Text Ratingscited by 33
- 2024Putting GPT-4o to the Sword: A Comprehensive Evaluation of Language, Vision, Speech, and Multimodal Proficiencycited by 31
4 more
- 2023Enhancing Psychological Counseling with Large Language Model: A Multifaceted Decision-Support System for Non-Professionalscited by 24
- 2024Are Large Language Models Reliable Argument Quality Annotators?cited by 24
- 2023Helping the Helper: Supporting Peer Counselors via AI-Empowered Practice and Feedbackcited by 23
- 2024A Novel LLM-based Two-stage Summarization Approach for Long Dialoguescited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.