mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Information-Theoretic Storage Cost in Sentence Comprehension

arXiv 2602.18217 ↗First posted 20 Feb 2026cs.CLcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Real-time sentence comprehension imposes a significant load on working memory, as comprehenders must maintain contextual information to anticipate future input. While measures of such load have played an important role in psycholinguistic theories, they have largely been formalized using symbolic grammars, which assign discrete, uniform costs to syntactic predictions. This study proposes a measure of processing storage cost based on an information-theoretic formalization, as the amount of information previous words carry about future context, under uncertainty. Unlike previous discrete, grammar-based metrics, this measure is continuous, probabilistic, theory-neutral, and can be estimated from pre-trained neural language models. The validity of this approach is demonstrated through three analyses in English: our measure (i) recovers well-known processing asymmetries in center embeddings and relative clauses, (ii) correlates with a grammar-based storage cost in a syntactically-annotated corpus, and (iii) predicts reading-time variance in two large-scale naturalistic datasets over and above baseline models with traditional information-based predictors. Our code is available at https://github.com/kohei-kaji/info-storage.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 76 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Feb 2026.

Builds on

13 of 76 references.

References · 13

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
  2. 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,372
  3. 2020The Pile: An 800GB Dataset of Diverse Text for Language Modelingcited by 2,411
  4. 2020Stanza: A Python Natural Language Processing Toolkit for Many Human Languagescited by 723
  5. 2020Universal Dependencies v2: An Evergrowing Multilingual Treebank Collectioncited by 271
  6. 2022Why Does Surprisal From Larger Transformer-Based Language Models Provide a Poorer Fit to Human Reading Times?cited by 113
  7. 2023Testing the Predictions of Surprisal Theory in 11 Languagescited by 77
  8. 2017The Natural Stories Corpuscited by 40
  9. 2024Frequency Explains the Inverse Correlation of Large Language Models' Size, Training Data Amount, and Surprisal's Fit to Reading Timescited by 39
  10. 2024Leading Whitespaces of Language Models' Subword Vocabulary Pose a Confound for Calculating Word Probabilitiescited by 30
  11. 2025What Can String Probability Tell Us About Grammaticality?cited by 16
  12. 2021Linguistic Dependencies and Statistical Dependencecited by 10
1 more
  1. 2025Strategic resource allocation in memory encoding: An efficiency principle shaping language processingcited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.