mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

A Geometric Probe of the Accuracy-Robustness Trade-off: Sharp Boundaries in Symmetry-Breaking Dimensional Expansion

arXiv 2602.17948 ↗First posted 20 Feb 2026cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The trade-off between clean accuracy and adversarial robustness is a pervasive phenomenon in deep learning, yet its geometric origin remains elusive. In this work, we utilize Symmetry-Breaking Dimensional Expansion (SBDE) as a controlled probe to investigate the mechanism underlying this trade-off. SBDE expands input images by inserting constant-valued pixels, which breaks translational symmetry and consistently improves clean accuracy (e.g., from 90.47% to 95.63% on CIFAR-10 with ResNet-18) by reducing parameter degeneracy. However, this accuracy gain comes at the cost of reduced robustness against iterative white-box attacks. By employing a test-time mask projection that resets the inserted auxiliary pixels to their training values, we demonstrate that the vulnerability stems almost entirely from the inserted dimensions. The projection effectively neutralizes the attacks and restores robustness, revealing that the model achieves high accuracy by creating sharp boundaries (steep loss gradients) specifically along the auxiliary axes. Our findings provide a concrete geometric explanation for the accuracy-robustness paradox: the optimization landscape deepens the basin of attraction to improve accuracy but inevitably erects steep walls along the auxiliary degrees of freedom, creating a fragile sensitivity to off-manifold perturbations.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Feb 2026.

Builds on

20 of 32 references.

References · 20

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
  3. 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,267
  4. 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,287
  5. 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,326
  6. 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,114
  7. 2016Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural Networkscited by 2,976
  8. 2016Adversarial examples in the physical worldcited by 1,762
  9. 2019Theoretically Principled Trade-off between Robustness and Accuracycited by 1,510
  10. 2018Obfuscated Gradients Give a False Sense of Security: Circumventing Defenses to Adversarial Examplescited by 1,259
  11. 2019Adversarial Examples Are Not Bugs, They Are Featurescited by 950
  12. 2018Robustness May Be at Odds with Accuracycited by 873
8 more
  1. 2015The Limitations of Deep Learning in Adversarial Settingscited by 784
  2. 2020On Adaptive Attacks to Adversarial Example Defensescited by 547
  3. 2018Threat of Adversarial Attacks on Deep Learning in Computer Vision: A Surveycited by 459
  4. 2018Adversarially Robust Generalization Requires More Datacited by 318
  5. 2018Disentangling Adversarial Robustness and Generalizationcited by 171
  6. 2022On the uncertainty principle of neural networkscited by 4
  7. 2024Quantum-Inspired Analysis of Neural Network Vulnerabilities: The Role of Conjugate Variables in System Attackscited by 4
  8. 2024Symmetry Breaking in Neural Network Optimization: Insights from Input Dimension Expansioncited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.