mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

ArXiv-to-Model: A Practical Study of Scientific LM Training

arXiv 2602.17288 ↗First posted 19 Feb 2026cs.AI cs.CLcited by 0

On the map: LLM reasoning → Reasoning benchmarks and evaluation

Abstract (arXiv)

While frontier large language models demonstrate strong reasoning and mathematical capabilities, the practical process of training domain-specialized scientific language models from raw sources remains under-documented. In this work, we present a detailed case study of training a 1.36B-parameter scientific language model directly from raw arXiv LaTeX sources spanning mathematics, computer science, and theoretical physics. We describe an end-to-end pipeline covering metadata filtering, archive validation, LaTeX extraction, text normalization, domain-aware tokenization, and dense transformer training under constrained compute (2xA100 GPUs). Through 24 experimental runs, we analyze training stability, scaling behavior, data yield losses, and infrastructure bottlenecks. Our findings highlight how preprocessing decisions significantly affect usable token volume, how tokenization impacts symbolic stability, and how storage and I/O constraints can rival compute as limiting factors. We further analyze convergence dynamics and show stable training behavior in a data-rich regime (52B pretraining tokens). Rather than proposing a novel architecture, this work provides an engineering-grounded, transparent account of training a small scientific language model from scratch. We hope these insights support researchers operating under moderate compute budgets who seek to build domain-specialized models.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Reasoning benchmarks and evaluation, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 0 of its 1 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Feb 2026.

Builds on

0 of 1 references.

No references here yet.

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024PARAMANU-GANITA: Can Small Math Language Models Rival with Large Language Models on Mathematical Reasoning?
  2. 2023LMFlow: An Extensible Toolkit for Finetuning and Inference of Large Foundation Models
  3. 2025ResearchGPT: Benchmarking and Training LLMs for End-to-End Computer Science Research Workflows
  4. 2025Thinking Augmented Pre-training
  5. 2025The Automated LLM Speedrunning Benchmark: Reproducing NanoGPT Improvements
  6. 2025DeepDistill: Enhancing LLM Reasoning Capabilities via Large-Scale Difficulty-Graded Data Training
  7. 2025MASS: Mathematical Data Selection via Skill Graphs for Pretraining Large Language Models
  8. 2024DeepSeek LLM: Scaling Open-Source Language Models with Longtermism