Thinking Augmented Pre-training
On the map: LLM reasoning → Reasoning benchmarks and evaluation
Abstract (arXiv)
This paper introduces a simple and scalable approach to improve the data efficiency of large language model (LLM) training by augmenting existing text data with thinking trajectories. The compute for pre-training LLMs has been growing at an unprecedented rate, while the availability of high-quality data remains limited. Consequently, maximizing the utility of available data constitutes a significant research challenge. A primary impediment is that certain high-quality tokens are difficult to learn given a fixed model capacity, as the underlying rationale for a single token can be exceptionally complex and deep. To address this issue, we propose Thinking augmented Pre-Training (TPT), a universal methodology that augments text with automatically generated thinking trajectories. Such augmentation effectively increases the volume of the training data and makes high-quality tokens more learnable through step-by-step reasoning and decomposition. We apply TPT across diverse training configurations up to 100B tokens, encompassing pre-training with both constrained and abundant data, as well as mid-training from strong open-source checkpoints. Experimental results indicate that our method substantially improves the performance of LLMs across various model sizes and families. Notably, TPT enhances the data efficiency of LLM pre-training by a factor of 3. For a 3B parameter model, it improves the post-training performance by over 10% on several challenging reasoning benchmarks.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Reasoning benchmarks and evaluation, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 25 of its 43 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Sep 2025.
Builds on
25 of 43 references.
Closest ancestors · 3
Same direction, newest first
- 2025OpenThoughts: Data Recipes for Reasoning Models4 Jun
- 2025Mining Hidden Thoughts from Texts: Evaluating Continual Pretraining with Synthetic Data for LLM Reasoning15 May
- 2025Qwen3 Technical Report14 May
Other references · 22
- 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,192
- 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 9,743
- 2021Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Codecited by 8,053
- 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,768
- 2020Scaling Laws for Neural Language Modelscited by 6,411
- 2025DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learningcited by 6,146
- 2021Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Datasetcited by 5,203
- 2024Qwen2.5 Technical Reportcited by 4,713
- 2024GPT-4o System Cardcited by 4,467
- 2024LiveCodeBench: Holistic and Contamination Free Evaluation of Large Language Models for Codecited by 1,906
- 2024OpenAI o1 System Cardcited by 1,220
- 2023Textbooks Are All You Needcited by 561
10 more
- 2025OctoThinker: Mid-training Incentivizes Reinforcement Learning Scalingcited by 110
- 2025Towards System 2 Reasoning in LLMs: Learning How to Think With Meta Chain-of-Thoughtcited by 108
- 2025AceReason-Nemotron 1.1: Advancing Math and Code Reasoning through SFT and RL Synergycited by 75
- 2025MegaMath: Pushing the Limits of Open Math Corporacited by 47
- 2025Scaling Laws of Synthetic Data for Language Modelscited by 44
- 2025Reasoning to Learn from Latent Thoughtscited by 43
- 2025Reinforcement Pre-Trainingcited by 40
- 2025Recycling the Web: A Method to Enhance Pre-training Data Quality and Quantity for Language Modelscited by 31
- 2025Learning Facts at Scale with Active Readingcited by 11
- 2025Essential-Web v1.0: 24T tokens of organized web datacited by 6
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 3.
4 papers.
- 2026Self-Improving Pretraining: using post-trained models to pretrain better modelscited by 6
- 2025MixtureVitae: Open Web-Scale Pretraining Dataset With High Quality Instruction and Reasoning Data Built from Permissive-First Text Sourcescited by 3
- 2026Reasoning Primitives in Hybrid and Non-Hybrid LLMs: Do Architectural Differences Yield Advantages in State-Tracking and Recall?cited by 1
- 2026HyperCLOVA X 32B Thinkcited by 0
- 2026Reasoning Primitives in Hybrid and Non-Hybrid LLMs: Do Architectural Differences Yield Advantages in State-Tracking and Recall?23 Apr 2026
- 2026Self-Improving Pretraining: using post-trained models to pretrain better models29 Jan 2026
- 2026HyperCLOVA X 32B Think3 Jan 2026
- 2025MixtureVitae: Open Web-Scale Pretraining Dataset With High Quality Instruction and Reasoning Data Built from Permissive-First Text Sources29 Sep 2025
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025PonderLM-2: Pretraining LLM with Latent Thoughts in Continuous Space
- 2025LLM Post-Training: A Deep Dive into Reasoning Large Language Models
- 2024Accelerating Large Language Model Pretraining via LFR Pedagogy: Learn, Focus, and Review
- 2025Think, Prune, Train, Improve: Scaling Reasoning without Scaling Models
- 2025Comparing Knowledge Injection Methods for LLMs in a Low-Resource Regime
- 2026Think Deep, Not Just Long: Measuring LLM Reasoning Effort via Deep-Thinking Tokens
- 2025Think Twice: Enhancing LLM Reasoning by Scaling Multi-round Test-time Thinking
- 2025DeepDistill: Enhancing LLM Reasoning Capabilities via Large-Scale Difficulty-Graded Data Training