Human-AI Collaboration in Large Language Model-Integrated Building Energy Management Systems: The Role of User Domain Knowledge and AI Literacy
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
This study aimed to comprehend how user domain knowledge and artificial intelligence (AI) literacy impact the effective use of human-AI interactive building energy management system (BEMS). While prior studies have investigated the potential of integrating large language models (LLMs) into BEMS or building energy modeling, very few studies have examined how user interact with such systems. We conducted a systematic role-playing experiment, where 85 human subjects interacted with an advanced generative pre-trained transformer (OpenAI GPT-4o). Participants were tasked with identifying the top five behavioral changes that could reduce home energy use with the GPT model that functioned as an LLM-integrated BEMS. Then, the collected prompt-response data and participant conclusions were analyzed using an analytical framework that hierarchically assessed and scored human-AI interactions and their home energy analysis approaches. Also, participants were classified into four groups based on their self-evaluated domain knowledge of building energy use and AI literacy, and Kruskal-Wallis H tests with post-hoc pairwise comparisons were conducted across 20 quantifiable metrics. Key takeaways include: most participants employed concise prompts (median: 16.2 words) and relied heavily on GPT's analytical capabilities; and notably, only 1 of 20 metrics, appliance identification rate, showed statistically significant group differences (p=0.037), driven by AI literacy rather than domain knowledge, suggesting an equalizing effect of LLMs across expertise levels. This study provides foundational insights into human-AI collaboration dynamics and promising development directions in the context of LLM-integrated BEMS and contributes to realizing human-centric LLM-integrated energy systems.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 85 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Feb 2026.
Builds on
16 of 85 references.
References · 16
- 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,393
- 2024GPT-4o System Cardcited by 4,467
- 2023G-Eval: NLG Evaluation using GPT-4 with Better Human Alignmentcited by 2,205
- 2023Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Large Language Models: A Surveycited by 2,185
- 2020Does the Whole Exceed its Parts? The Effect of AI Explanations on Complementary Team Performancecited by 396
- 2020Effect of Confidence and Explanation on Accuracy and Trust Calibration in AI-Assisted Decision Makingcited by 281
- 2023AI Transparency in the Age of LLMs: A Human-Centered Research Roadmapcited by 119
- 2024Mini-Omni2: Towards Open-source GPT-4o with Vision, Speech and Duplex Capabilitiescited by 104
- 2023The Metacognitive Demands and Opportunities of Generative AIcited by 85
- 2020Deciding Fast and Slow: The Role of Cognitive Biases in AI-assisted Decision-makingcited by 59
- 2022Do People Engage Cognitively with AI? Impact of AI Assistance on Incidental Learningcited by 53
- 2020The Role of Domain Expertise in User Trust and the Impact of First Impressions with Intelligent Systemscited by 34
4 more
- 2022Advancing Human-AI Complementarity: The Impact of User Expertise and Algorithmic Tuning on Joint Decision Makingcited by 33
- 2022Who Goes First? Influences of Human-AI Workflow on Decision Making in Clinical Imagingcited by 32
- 2024"Are You Really Sure?" Understanding the Effects of Human Self-Confidence Calibration in AI-Assisted Decision Makingcited by 26
- 2025Context-aware LLM-based AI Agents for Human-centered Energy Management Systems in Smart Buildingscited by 4
Built on by
Not cited yet.