Empirical Cumulative Distribution Function Clustering for LLM-based Agent System Analysis
On the map: LLM agents and tool use → General LLM agent frameworks and benchmarks
Abstract (arXiv)
Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used as agents to solve complex tasks such as question answering (QA), scientific debate, and software development. A standard evaluation procedure aggregates multiple responses from LLM agents into a single final answer, often via majority voting, and compares it against reference answers. However, this process can obscure the quality and distributional characteristics of the original responses. In this paper, we propose a novel evaluation framework based on the empirical cumulative distribution function (ECDF) of cosine similarities between generated responses and reference answers. This enables a more nuanced assessment of response quality beyond exact match metrics. To analyze the response distributions across different agent configurations, we further introduce a clustering method for ECDFs using their distances and the k-medoids algorithm. Our experiments on a QA dataset demonstrate that ECDFs can distinguish between agent settings with similar final accuracies but different quality distributions. The clustering analysis also reveals interpretable group structures in the responses, offering insights into the impact of temperature, persona, and question topics.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in General LLM agent frameworks and benchmarks, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 28 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Feb 2026.
Builds on
28 of 35 references.
Closest ancestors · 6
Same direction, newest first
- 2024Improving Multi-Agent Debate with Sparse Communication Topology17 Jun
- 2024Mixture-of-Agents Enhances Large Language Model Capabilities7 Jun
- 2024More Agents Is All You Need3 Feb
- 2024Large Language Model based Multi-Agents: A Survey of Progress and Challenges21 Jan
- 2023ChatEval: Towards Better LLM-based Evaluators through Multi-Agent Debate14 Aug
- 2023MetaGPT: Meta Programming for A Multi-Agent Collaborative Framework1 Aug
Other references · 22
- 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,302
- 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 9,743
- 2019Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networkscited by 9,049
- 2019BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTcited by 5,462
- 2024GPT-4o System Cardcited by 4,467
- 2016SQuAD: 100,000+ Questions for Machine Comprehension of Textcited by 4,115
- 2023AutoGen: Enabling Next-Gen LLM Applications via Multi-Agent Conversationcited by 1,906
- 2018CommonsenseQA: A Question Answering Challenge Targeting Commonsense Knowledgecited by 1,793
- 2023Improving Factuality and Reasoning in Language Models through Multiagent Debatecited by 1,739
- 2023Encouraging Divergent Thinking in Large Language Models through Multi-Agent Debatecited by 995
- 2023ChatDev: Communicative Agents for Software Developmentcited by 893
- 2021Did Aristotle Use a Laptop? A Question Answering Benchmark with Implicit Reasoning Strategiescited by 736
10 more
- 2024Scaling Synthetic Data Creation with 1,000,000,000 Personascited by 397
- 2018SWAG: A Large-Scale Adversarial Dataset for Grounded Commonsense Inferencecited by 333
- 2023MedAgents: Large Language Models as Collaborators for Zero-shot Medical Reasoningcited by 311
- 2023ReConcile: Round-Table Conference Improves Reasoning via Consensus among Diverse LLMscited by 297
- 2024Debating with More Persuasive LLMs Leads to More Truthful Answerscited by 255
- 2023Personality Traits in Large Language Modelscited by 166
- 2023Exchange-of-Thought: Enhancing Large Language Model Capabilities through Cross-Model Communicationcited by 78
- 2025Voting or Consensus? Decision-Making in Multi-Agent Debatecited by 55
- 2024Counterfactual Debating with Preset Stances for Hallucination Elimination of LLMscited by 17
- 2025The Hidden Strength of Disagreement: Unraveling the Consensus-Diversity Tradeoff in Adaptive Multi-Agent Systemscited by 11
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026A Tri-Agent Framework for Evaluating and Aligning Question Clarification Capabilities of Large Language Models
- 2025Collaborative QA using Interacting LLMs. Impact of Network Structure, Node Capability and Distributed Data
- 2026DiscoUQ: Structured Disagreement Analysis for Uncertainty Quantification in LLM Agent Ensembles
- 2026Uncertainty Quantification for LLM Agents: A Taxonomy, an Evaluation Protocol, and an Empirical Study
- 2025Agent-Based Detection and Resolution of Incompleteness and Ambiguity in Interactions with Large Language Models
- 2025Collective Reasoning Among LLMs: A Framework for Answer Validation Without Ground Truth
- 2025JudgeAgent: Beyond Static Benchmarks for Knowledge-Driven and Dynamic LLM Evaluation
- 2025Modeling Response Consistency in Multi-Agent LLM Systems: A Comparative Analysis of Shared and Separate Context Approaches