mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

GPSBench: Do Large Language Models Understand GPS Coordinates?

arXiv 2602.16105 ↗First posted 18 Feb 2026cs.AIcited by 2

On the map: LLM reasoning → Spatial and embodied reasoning

Abstract (arXiv)

Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed in applications that interact with the physical world, such as navigation, robotics, or mapping, making robust geospatial reasoning a critical capability. Despite that, LLMs' ability to reason about GPS coordinates and real-world geography remains underexplored. We introduce GPSBench, a dataset of 57,800 samples across 17 tasks for evaluating geospatial reasoning in LLMs, spanning geometric coordinate operations (e.g., distance and bearing computation) and reasoning that integrates coordinates with world knowledge. Focusing on intrinsic model capabilities rather than tool use, we evaluate 14 state-of-the-art LLMs and find that GPS reasoning remains challenging, with substantial variation across tasks: models are generally more reliable at real-world geographic reasoning than at geometric computations. Geographic knowledge degrades hierarchically, with strong country-level performance but weak city-level localization, while robustness to coordinate noise suggests genuine coordinate understanding rather than memorization. We further show that GPS-coordinate augmentation can improve in downstream geospatial tasks, and that finetuning induces trade-offs between gains in geometric computation and degradation in world knowledge. Our dataset and reproducible code are available at https://github.com/joey234/gpsbench

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Spatial and embodied reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 22 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Feb 2026.

Builds on

22 of 33 references.

Closest ancestors · 7

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025GeoGramBench: Benchmarking the Geometric Program Reasoning in Modern LLMs23 May
  2. 2024MapEval: A Map-Based Evaluation of Geo-Spatial Reasoning in Foundation Models31 Dec
  3. 2024Thinking in Space: How Multimodal Large Language Models See, Remember, and Recall Spaces18 Dec
  4. 2024Is A Picture Worth A Thousand Words? Delving Into Spatial Reasoning for Vision Language Models21 Jun
  5. 2024SpatialVLM: Endowing Vision-Language Models with Spatial Reasoning Capabilities22 Jan
  6. 2023What's "up" with vision-language models? Investigating their struggle with spatial reasoning30 Oct
  7. 2022Visual Spatial Reasoning30 Apr

Other references · 15

  1. 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 9,743
  2. 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,195
  3. 2021Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Codecited by 8,053
  4. 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,768
  5. 2025Gemini 2.5: Pushing the Frontier with Advanced Reasoning, Multimodality, Long Context, and Next Generation Agentic Capabilitiescited by 3,655
  6. 2023LingoQA: Visual Question Answering for Autonomous Drivingcited by 144
  7. 2024Large Language Models are Geographically Biasedcited by 91
  8. 2023Evaluating Spatial Understanding of Large Language Modelscited by 65
  9. 2023GeoLLM: Extracting Geospatial Knowledge from Large Language Modelscited by 62
  10. 2023Autonomous GIS: the next-generation AI-powered GIScited by 52
  11. 2025SpatialBench: Benchmarking Multimodal Large Language Models for Spatial Cognitioncited by 35
  12. 2025GeoBenchX: Benchmarking LLMs in Agent Solving Multistep Geospatial Taskscited by 11
3 more
  1. 2025GeoAnalystBench: A GeoAI benchmark for assessing large language models for spatial analysis workflow and code generationcited by 9
  2. 2023GeoGLUE: A GeoGraphic Language Understanding Evaluation Benchmarkcited by 5
  3. 2024Distortions in Judged Spatial Relations in Large Language Modelscited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Understanding the Geospatial Reasoning Capabilities of LLMs: A Trajectory Recovery Perspective
  2. 2023Are Large Language Models Geospatially Knowledgeable?
  3. 2026From Symbolic to Geometric: Enabling Spatial Reasoning in Large Language Models
  4. 2025Foundation Models for Geospatial Reasoning: Assessing Capabilities of Large Language Models in Understanding Geometries and Topological Spatial Relations
  5. 2026Vision-Language Reasoning for Geolocalization: A Reinforcement Learning Approach
  6. 2025Stuck in the Matrix: Probing Spatial Reasoning in Large Language Models
  7. 2025Around the World in 24 Hours: Probing LLM Knowledge of Time and Place
  8. 2025GeoSense: Evaluating Identification and Application of Geometric Principles in Multimodal Reasoning