mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Controlled oscillation modeling using port-Hamiltonian neural networks

arXiv 2602.15704 ↗First posted 17 Feb 2026cs.LG cs.SY eess.SYcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Learning dynamical systems through purely data-driven methods is challenging as they do not learn the underlying conservation laws that enable them to correctly generalize. Existing port-Hamiltonian neural network methods have recently been successfully applied for modeling mechanical systems. However, even though these methods are designed on power-balance principles, they usually do not consider power-preserving discretizations and often rely on Runge-Kutta numerical methods. In this work, we propose to use a second-order discrete gradient method embedded in the learning of dynamical systems with port-Hamiltonian neural networks. Numerical results are provided for three systems deliberately selected to span different ranges of dynamical behavior under control: a baseline harmonic oscillator with quadratic energy storage; a Duffing oscillator, with a non-quadratic Hamiltonian offering amplitude-dependent effects; and a self-sustained oscillator, which can stabilize in a controlled limit cycle through the incorporation of a nonlinear dissipation. We show how the use of this discrete gradient method outperforms the performance of a Runge-Kutta method of the same order. Experiments are also carried out to compare two theoretically equivalent port-Hamiltonian systems formulations and to analyze the impact of regularizing the Jacobian of port-Hamiltonian neural networks during training.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 52 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Feb 2026.

Builds on

23 of 52 references.

References · 23

  1. 2018Neural Ordinary Differential Equationscited by 3,733
  2. 2018Spectral Normalization for Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 1,618
  3. 2019Hamiltonian Neural Networkscited by 702
  4. 2019Augmented Neural ODEscited by 396
  5. 2020How to train your neural ODE: the world of Jacobian and kinetic regularizationcited by 228
  6. 2019Symplectic ODE-Net: Learning Hamiltonian Dynamics with Controlcited by 183
  7. 2017Spectral Norm Regularization for Improving the Generalizability of Deep Learningcited by 178
  8. 2020Dissipative SymODEN: Encoding Hamiltonian Dynamics with Dissipation and Control into Deep Learningcited by 77
  9. 2021Port-Hamiltonian Neural Networks for Learning Explicit Time-Dependent Dynamical Systemscited by 66
  10. 2022When Physics Meets Machine Learning: A Survey of Physics-Informed Machine Learningcited by 64
  11. 2022Dissipative Hamiltonian Neural Networks: Learning Dissipative and Conservative Dynamics Separatelycited by 46
  12. 2020Nonseparable Symplectic Neural Networkscited by 31
11 more
  1. 2022On Numerical Integration in Neural Ordinary Differential Equationscited by 21
  2. 2020Sparse Symplectically Integrated Neural Networkscited by 20
  3. 2022Pseudo-Hamiltonian Neural Networks with State-Dependent External Forcescited by 17
  4. 2022Compositional Learning of Dynamical System Models Using Port-Hamiltonian Neural Networkscited by 17
  5. 2025Stable Port-Hamiltonian Neural Networkscited by 13
  6. 2024Physics-Enhanced Machine Learning: a position paper for dynamical systems investigationscited by 11
  7. 2025Nonlinear port-Hamiltonian system identification from input-state-output data (ISO-pHNN)cited by 6
  8. 2023Learning Dynamical Systems from Noisy Data with Inverse-Explicit Integratorscited by 4
  9. 2021Port-Hamiltonian System Identification from Noisy Frequency Response Datacited by 3
  10. 2024Learning Generalized Hamiltonians using fully Symplectic Mappingscited by 2
  11. 2022Structure-Preserving Model Order Reduction for Index One Port-Hamiltonian Descriptor Systemscited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.