Controlled oscillation modeling using port-Hamiltonian neural networks
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Learning dynamical systems through purely data-driven methods is challenging as they do not learn the underlying conservation laws that enable them to correctly generalize. Existing port-Hamiltonian neural network methods have recently been successfully applied for modeling mechanical systems. However, even though these methods are designed on power-balance principles, they usually do not consider power-preserving discretizations and often rely on Runge-Kutta numerical methods. In this work, we propose to use a second-order discrete gradient method embedded in the learning of dynamical systems with port-Hamiltonian neural networks. Numerical results are provided for three systems deliberately selected to span different ranges of dynamical behavior under control: a baseline harmonic oscillator with quadratic energy storage; a Duffing oscillator, with a non-quadratic Hamiltonian offering amplitude-dependent effects; and a self-sustained oscillator, which can stabilize in a controlled limit cycle through the incorporation of a nonlinear dissipation. We show how the use of this discrete gradient method outperforms the performance of a Runge-Kutta method of the same order. Experiments are also carried out to compare two theoretically equivalent port-Hamiltonian systems formulations and to analyze the impact of regularizing the Jacobian of port-Hamiltonian neural networks during training.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 52 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Feb 2026.
Builds on
23 of 52 references.
References · 23
- 2018Neural Ordinary Differential Equationscited by 3,733
- 2018Spectral Normalization for Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 1,618
- 2019Hamiltonian Neural Networkscited by 702
- 2019Augmented Neural ODEscited by 396
- 2020How to train your neural ODE: the world of Jacobian and kinetic regularizationcited by 228
- 2019Symplectic ODE-Net: Learning Hamiltonian Dynamics with Controlcited by 183
- 2017Spectral Norm Regularization for Improving the Generalizability of Deep Learningcited by 178
- 2020Dissipative SymODEN: Encoding Hamiltonian Dynamics with Dissipation and Control into Deep Learningcited by 77
- 2021Port-Hamiltonian Neural Networks for Learning Explicit Time-Dependent Dynamical Systemscited by 66
- 2022When Physics Meets Machine Learning: A Survey of Physics-Informed Machine Learningcited by 64
- 2022Dissipative Hamiltonian Neural Networks: Learning Dissipative and Conservative Dynamics Separatelycited by 46
- 2020Nonseparable Symplectic Neural Networkscited by 31
11 more
- 2022On Numerical Integration in Neural Ordinary Differential Equationscited by 21
- 2020Sparse Symplectically Integrated Neural Networkscited by 20
- 2022Pseudo-Hamiltonian Neural Networks with State-Dependent External Forcescited by 17
- 2022Compositional Learning of Dynamical System Models Using Port-Hamiltonian Neural Networkscited by 17
- 2025Stable Port-Hamiltonian Neural Networkscited by 13
- 2024Physics-Enhanced Machine Learning: a position paper for dynamical systems investigationscited by 11
- 2025Nonlinear port-Hamiltonian system identification from input-state-output data (ISO-pHNN)cited by 6
- 2023Learning Dynamical Systems from Noisy Data with Inverse-Explicit Integratorscited by 4
- 2021Port-Hamiltonian System Identification from Noisy Frequency Response Datacited by 3
- 2024Learning Generalized Hamiltonians using fully Symplectic Mappingscited by 2
- 2022Structure-Preserving Model Order Reduction for Index One Port-Hamiltonian Descriptor Systemscited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.