mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

GRACE: an Agentic AI for Particle Physics Experiment Design and Simulation

arXiv 2602.15039 ↗First posted 31 Jan 2026hep-ex cs.AIcited by 5

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Web, search, and research agents

Abstract (arXiv)

We present GRACE, a simulation-native agent for autonomous experimental design in high-energy and nuclear physics. Given multimodal input in the form of a natural-language prompt or a published experimental paper, the agent extracts a structured representation of the experiment, constructs a runnable toy simulation, and autonomously explores design modifications using first-principles Monte Carlo methods. Unlike agentic systems focused on operational control or execution of predefined procedures, GRACE addresses the upstream problem of experimental design: proposing non-obvious modifications to detector geometry, materials, and configurations that improve physics performance under physical and practical constraints. The agent evaluates candidate designs through repeated simulation, physics-motivated utility functions, and budget-aware escalation from fast parametric models to full Geant4 simulations, while maintaining strict reproducibility and provenance tracking. We demonstrate the framework on historical experimental setups, showing that the agent can identify optimization directions that align with known upgrade priorities, using only baseline simulation inputs. We also conducted a benchmark in which the agent identified the setup and proposed improvements from a suite of natural language prompts, with some supplied with a relevant physics research paper, of varying high energy physics (HEP) problem settings. This work establishes experimental design as a constrained search problem under physical law and introduces a new benchmark for autonomous, simulation-driven scientific reasoning in complex instruments.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Web, search, and research agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 7 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 31 Jan 2026.

Builds on

7 of 30 references.

Closest ancestors · 2

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025Automating High Energy Physics Data Analysis with LLM-Powered Agents8 Dec
  2. 2025Agentic Artificial Intelligence for Multistage Physics Experiments at a Large-Scale User Facility Particle Accelerator21 Sep

Other references · 5

  1. 2023Improving Factuality and Reasoning in Language Models through Multiagent Debatecited by 1,739
  2. 2024SWE-agent: Agent-Computer Interfaces Enable Automated Software Engineeringcited by 1,628
  3. 2018AI safety via debatecited by 384
  4. 2025A multi-agentic framework for real-time, autonomous freeform metasurface designcited by 14
  5. 2025GENIUS: An Agentic AI Framework for Autonomous Design and Execution of Simulation Protocolscited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 5.

5 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Collider-Bench: Benchmarking AI Agents with Particle Physics Analysis Reproduction
  2. 2025PhysMaster: Building an Autonomous AI Physicist for Theoretical and Computational Physics Research
  3. 2026Agentic AI -- Physicist Collaboration in Experimental Particle Physics: A Proof-of-Concept Measurement with LEP Open Data
  4. 2026NeutronGym: Physics-Graded Neutron Instrument Design for LLM Agents
  5. 2026AI Agents, Language, Deep Learning and the Next Revolution in Science
  6. 2024Towards Agentic AI on Particle Accelerators
  7. 2026Grounded autonomous scrutiny at scale: emergent critique from reproduction of published computational physics papers
  8. 2025Multi-Agent Design Assistant for the Simulation of Inertial Fusion Energy