mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Algorithmic Simplification of Neural Networks with Mosaic-of-Motifs

arXiv 2602.14896 ↗First posted 16 Feb 2026cs.LGcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Large-scale deep learning models are well-suited for compression. Across a variety of tasks, methods like pruning, quantization, and knowledge distillation have been used to achieve massive reductions in model parameters with only marginal performance drops. This raises the central question: *Why are deep neural networks suited for compression?* In this work, we take up the perspective of algorithmic complexity to explain this behavior. We hypothesize that the parameters of trained models have more structure and, hence, exhibit lower algorithmic complexity compared to the weights at (random) initialization. Furthermore, model compression methods harness this reduced algorithmic complexity to compress models. Although an unconstrained parameterization of model weights, w ∈ ℝn, can represent arbitrary weight assignments, the solutions found during training exhibit repeatability and structure, making them simpler to implement than a trivial program. To this end, we formalize the Kolmogorov complexity of w by K(w). We introduce a constrained parameterization widehatw that partitions parameters into blocks of size s and restricts each block to be selected from a set of k reusable motifs, specified by a reuse pattern (or mosaic). The resulting method, mathitMosaic-of-Motifs (MoMos), provides a theoretically justified parameterization that biases optimization toward algorithmically simpler solutions. Empirical evidence from multiple experiments shows that MoMos consistently lowers the algorithmic complexity of neural networks during training while preserving the performance of unconstrained models. These results suggest that parameter compressibility is not only observed after training, but can be induced from the optimization domain.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 39 of its 69 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Feb 2026.

Builds on

39 of 69 references.

References · 39

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
  3. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
  4. 2021Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted Windowscited by 12,082
  5. 2015Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Networkcited by 10,076
  6. 2019EfficientNet: Rethinking Model Scaling for Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 6,415
  7. 2020Scaling Laws for Neural Language Modelscited by 6,411
  8. 2017Neural Discrete Representation Learningcited by 4,650
  9. 2016Pointer Sentinel Mixture Modelscited by 2,992
  10. 2015Deep Compression: Compressing Deep Neural Networks with Pruning, Trained Quantization and Huffman Codingcited by 2,291
  11. 2018The Lottery Ticket Hypothesis: Finding Sparse, Trainable Neural Networkscited by 2,250
  12. 2013Estimating or Propagating Gradients Through Stochastic Neurons for Conditional Computationcited by 2,031
27 more
  1. 2017Quantization and Training of Neural Networks for Efficient Integer-Arithmetic-Only Inferencecited by 1,548
  2. 2017Visualizing the Loss Landscape of Neural Netscited by 1,126
  3. 2018Efficient Neural Architecture Search via Parameter Sharingcited by 831
  4. 2021Carbon Emissions and Large Neural Network Trainingcited by 561
  5. 2017Deep Learning Scaling is Predictable, Empiricallycited by 556
  6. 2017Opening the Black Box of Deep Neural Networks via Informationcited by 494
  7. 2017Sharp Minima Can Generalize For Deep Netscited by 462
  8. 2021A White Paper on Neural Network Quantizationcited by 453
  9. 2016Entropy-SGD: Biasing Gradient Descent Into Wide Valleyscited by 357
  10. 2018Essentially No Barriers in Neural Network Energy Landscapecited by 328
  11. 2025SmolLM2: When Smol Goes Big -- Data-Centric Training of a Small Language Modelcited by 307
  12. 2017Information-theoretic analysis of generalization capability of learning algorithmscited by 299
  13. 2022TinyViT: Fast Pretraining Distillation for Small Vision Transformerscited by 232
  14. 2017Emergence of Invariance and Disentanglement in Deep Representationscited by 213
  15. 2019A Constructive Prediction of the Generalization Error Across Scalescited by 202
  16. 2014Compressing Deep Convolutional Networks using Vector Quantizationcited by 189
  17. 2018Deep learning generalizes because the parameter-function map is biased towards simple functionscited by 180
  18. 2017Soft Weight-Sharing for Neural Network Compressioncited by 99
  19. 2023The No Free Lunch Theorem, Kolmogorov Complexity, and the Role of Inductive Biases in Machine Learningcited by 63
  20. 2025Deep Learning is Not So Mysterious or Differentcited by 55
  21. 2018Deep k-Means: Re-Training and Parameter Sharing with Harder Cluster Assignments for Compressing Deep Convolutionscited by 33
  22. 2019Iteratively Training Look-Up Tables for Network Quantizationcited by 9
  23. 2025LUT-DLA: Lookup Table as Efficient Extreme Low-Bit Deep Learning Acceleratorcited by 8
  24. 2021Compact and Optimal Deep Learning with Recurrent Parameter Generatorscited by 5
  25. 2025Binarized Neural Networks Converge Toward Algorithmic Simplicity: Empirical Support for the Learning-as-Compression Hypothesiscited by 3
  26. 2020Deeply Shared Filter Bases for Parameter-Efficient Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 2
  27. 2025CoDeQ: End-to-End Joint Model Compression with Dead-Zone Quantizer for High-Sparsity and Low-Precision Networkscited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.