mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Online LLM watermark detection via e-processes

arXiv 2602.14286 ↗First posted 15 Feb 2026stat.ME stat.MLcited by 1

On the map: LLM safety and security → Watermarking generated content and models

Abstract (arXiv)

Watermarking for large language models (LLMs) has emerged as an effective tool for distinguishing AI-generated text from human-written content. Statistically, watermark schemes induce dependence between generated tokens and a pseudo-random sequence, reducing watermark detection to a hypothesis testing problem on independence. We develop a unified framework for LLM watermark detection based on e-processes, providing anytime-valid guarantees for online testing. We propose various methods to construct empirically adaptive e-processes that can enhance the detection power. The proposed methods are applicable to any sequential testing problem where independent pivotal statistics are available. In addition, theoretical results are established to characterize the power properties of the proposed procedures. Some experiments demonstrate that the proposed framework achieves competitive performance compared to existing watermark detection methods.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Watermarking generated content and models, one of 12 directions in LLM safety and security. Builds on 20 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Feb 2026.

Builds on

20 of 38 references.

Closest ancestors · 6

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024Robust Detection of Watermarks for Large Language Models Under Human Edits21 Nov
  2. 2024A Statistical Framework of Watermarks for Large Language Models: Pivot, Detection Efficiency and Optimal Rules1 Apr
  3. 2023Mark My Words: Analyzing and Evaluating Language Model Watermarks1 Dec
  4. 2023Robust Distortion-free Watermarks for Language Models28 Jul
  5. 2023Three Bricks to Consolidate Watermarks for Large Language Models26 Jul
  6. 2023A Watermark for Large Language Models24 Jan

Other references · 14

  1. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
  2. 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,192
  3. 2016Categorical Reparameterization with Gumbel-Softmaxcited by 2,708
  4. 2021Ethical and social risks of harm from Language Modelscited by 957
  5. 2019Defending Against Neural Fake Newscited by 553
  6. 2023The Curse of Recursion: Training on Generated Data Makes Models Forgetcited by 343
  7. 2022Game-theoretic statistics and safe anytime-valid inferencecited by 145
  8. 2019Safe Testingcited by 98
  9. 2024Is Temperature the Creativity Parameter of Large Language Models?cited by 92
  10. 2024Hypothesis testing with e-valuescited by 70
  11. 2020Admissible anytime-valid sequential inference must rely on nonnegative martingalescited by 43
  12. 2024Under the Surface: Tracking the Artifactuality of LLM-Generated Datacited by 23
2 more
  1. 2022E-backtestingcited by 6
  2. 2026Online monotone density estimation and log-optimal calibrationcited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.