mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Reverse N-Wise Output-Oriented Testing for AI/ML and Quantum Computing Systems

arXiv 2602.14275 ↗First posted 15 Feb 2026cs.LG cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Artificial intelligence/machine learning (AI/ML) systems and emerging quantum computing software present unprecedented testing challenges characterized by high-dimensional/continuous input spaces, probabilistic/non-deterministic output distributions, behavioral correctness defined exclusively over observable prediction behaviors and measurement outcomes, and critical quality dimensions, trustworthiness, fairness, calibration, robustness, error syndrome patterns, that manifest through complex multi-way interactions among semantically meaningful output properties rather than deterministic input-output mappings. This paper introduces reverse n-wise output testing, a mathematically principled paradigm inversion that constructs covering arrays directly over domain-specific output equivalence classes, ML confidence calibration buckets, decision boundary regions, fairness partitions, embedding clusters, ranking stability bands, quantum measurement outcome distributions (0-dominant, 1-dominant, superposition collapse), error syndrome patterns (bit-flip, phase-flip, correlated errors), then solves the computationally challenging black-box inverse mapping problem via gradient-free metaheuristic optimization to synthesize input feature configurations or quantum circuit parameters capable of eliciting targeted behavioral signatures from opaque models. The framework delivers synergistic benefits across both domains: explicit customer-centric prediction/measurement coverage guarantees, substantial improvements in fault detection rates for ML calibration/boundary failures and quantum error syndromes, enhanced test suite efficiency, and structured MLOps/quantum validation pipelines with automated partition discovery from uncertainty analysis and coverage drift monitoring.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 7 of its 29 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Feb 2026.

Builds on

7 of 29 references.

References · 7

  1. 2016XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting Systemcited by 5,166
  2. 2020Beyond Accuracy: Behavioral Testing of NLP models with CheckListcited by 1,006
  3. 2017DeepXplore: Automated Whitebox Testing of Deep Learning Systemscited by 311
  4. 2018DeepGauge: Multi-Granularity Testing Criteria for Deep Learning Systemscited by 147
  5. 2018Guiding Deep Learning System Testing using Surprise Adequacycited by 124
  6. 2018Automated Directed Fairness Testingcited by 78
  7. 2023QuCAT: A Combinatorial Testing Tool for Quantum Softwarecited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024Assessing Superposition-Targeted Coverage Criteria for Quantum Neural Networks
  2. 2026Quantum-Enhanced Adversarial Robustness in Artificial Intelligence
  3. 2024Reinforcement learning-based architecture search for quantum machine learning
  4. 2025SoK: Critical Evaluation of Quantum Machine Learning for Adversarial Robustness
  5. 2025Quantum Architecture Search for Solving Quantum Machine Learning Tasks
  6. 2023MNISQ: A Large-Scale Quantum Circuit Dataset for Machine Learning on/for Quantum Computers in the NISQ era
  7. 2024JustQ: Automated Deployment of Fair and Accurate Quantum Neural Networks
  8. 2025Prospects for quantum advantage in machine learning from the representability of functions