mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

We can still parse using syntactic rules

arXiv 2602.14238 ↗First posted 15 Feb 2026cs.CLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

This research introduces a new parsing approach, based on earlier syntactic work on context free grammar (CFG) and generalized phrase structure grammar (GPSG). The approach comprises both a new parsing algorithm and a set of syntactic rules and features that overcome the limitations of CFG. It also generates both dependency and constituency parse trees, while accommodating noise and incomplete parses. The system was tested on data from Universal Dependencies, showing a promising average Unlabeled Attachment Score (UAS) of 54.5% in the development dataset (7 corpora) and 53.8% in the test set (12 corpora). The system also provides multiple parse hypotheses, allowing further reranking to improve parsing accuracy. This approach also leverages much of the theoretical syntactic work since the 1950s to be used within a computational context. The application of this approach provides a transparent and interpretable NLP model to process language input.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 25 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Feb 2026.

Builds on

8 of 25 references.

References · 8

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2020Universal Dependencies v2: An Evergrowing Multilingual Treebank Collectioncited by 269
  3. 2019Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar Parsing on Penn Treebankcited by 43
  4. 2023Revisiting Supertagging for Faster HPSG Pasingcited by 4
  5. 2019Automatic Inference of Minimalist Grammars using an SMT-Solvercited by 2
  6. 2021Head-driven Phrase Structure Parsing in O(n3) Time Complexitycited by 2
  7. 2021Expectation-based Minimalist Grammarscited by 2
  8. 2024An Attempt to Develop a Neural Parser based on Simplified Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar on Vietnamesecited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.