Learning to Select Like Humans: Explainable Active Learning for Medical Imaging
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Medical image analysis requires substantial labeled data for model training, yet expert annotation is expensive and time-consuming. Active learning (AL) addresses this challenge by strategically selecting the most informative samples for the annotation purpose, but traditional methods solely rely on predictive uncertainty while ignoring whether models learn from clinically meaningful features a critical requirement for clinical deployment. We propose an explainability-guided active learning framework that integrates spatial attention alignment into a sample acquisition process. Our approach advocates for a dual-criterion selection strategy combining: (i) classification uncertainty to identify informative examples, and (ii) attention misalignment with radiologist-defined regions-of-interest (ROIs) to target samples where the model focuses on incorrect features. By measuring misalignment between Grad-CAM attention maps and expert annotations using Dice similarity, our acquisition function judiciously identifies samples that enhance both predictive performance and spatial interpretability. We evaluate the framework using three expert-annotated medical imaging datasets, namely, BraTS (MRI brain tumors), VinDr-CXR (chest X-rays), and SIIM-COVID-19 (chest X-rays). Using only 570 strategically selected samples, our explainability-guided approach consistently outperforms random sampling across all the datasets, achieving 77.22% accuracy on BraTS, 52.37% on VinDr-CXR, and 52.66% on SIIM-COVID. Grad-CAM visualizations confirm that the models trained by our dual-criterion selection focus on diagnostically relevant regions, demonstrating that incorporating explanation guidance into sample acquisition yields superior data efficiency while maintaining clinical interpretability.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 45 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Feb 2026.
Builds on
21 of 45 references.
References · 21
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2016Densely Connected Convolutional Networkscited by 6,691
- 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,488
- 2017Prototypical Networks for Few-shot Learningcited by 3,001
- 2020A Survey of Deep Active Learningcited by 547
- 2020VinDr-CXR: An open dataset of chest X-rays with radiologist's annotationscited by 236
- 2017Cost-Effective Active Learning for Deep Image Classificationcited by 165
- 2019Active Learning for Deep Detection Neural Networkscited by 62
- 2020Explanation-Guided Training for Cross-Domain Few-Shot Classificationcited by 58
- 2023A survey on deep learning in medical image registration: new technologies, uncertainty, evaluation metrics, and beyondcited by 55
- 2023Active learning for medical image segmentation with stochastic batchescited by 20
- 2023Active Learning on Medical Imagecited by 10
9 more
- 2025Winsor-CAM: Human-Tunable Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Layer-Wise Winsorizationcited by 10
- 2024Dense Cross-Connected Ensemble Convolutional Neural Networks for Enhanced Model Robustnesscited by 9
- 2020A Transfer Learning Based Active Learning Framework for Brain Tumor Classificationcited by 8
- 2024Bridging Interpretability and Robustness Using LIME-Guided Model Refinementcited by 8
- 2025Expert-Guided Explainable Few-Shot Learning for Medical Image Diagnosiscited by 8
- 2025Bridging Symmetry and Robustness: On the Role of Equivariance in Enhancing Adversarial Robustnesscited by 8
- 2025Doctor-in-the-Loop: An Explainable, Multi-View Deep Learning Framework for Predicting Pathological Response in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancercited by 7
- 2021Improving a neural network model by explanation-guided training for glioma classification based on MRI datacited by 5
- 2023Learning to Learn for Few-shot Continual Active Learningcited by 5
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.
2 papers.