mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Semantic Chunking and the Entropy of Natural Language

arXiv 2602.13194 ↗First posted 13 Feb 2026cs.CL cond-mat.dis-nn cond-mat.stat-mechcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Humans and large language models can predict next letter or word from its prior context much better than random guessing, indicating strong redundancy of language viewed as a stochastic process. Quantitatively this redundancy was estimated by Shannon to be around 80%, which means that every letter of a printed English text conveys approximately 1 bit of information and not 4.8 bits that 27 letters (including spaces) could potentially carry. This estimate was later confirmed by using autoregressive token probabilies computed by large language models. However, the statistical organization of language that give rise to such a large redundancy remains unclear. Here we introduce a statistical framework of language linking its redundancy to the hierarchical semantic organization of text. To this end, we use large language models to recursively segment any given text into semantically coherent chunks, inducing a ``semantic tree'' that spans the whole range of text organization, beginning from its main idea to individual tokens (words). For a large corpus of texts of a particular type, say fiction stories, the resulting ensemble of semantic trees is characterized by specific statistical regularities, giving rise to a ``structural'' entropy rate defined in this study. Surprisingly, we discovered that for several datasets considered in this work, semantic tree entropy rate was quite close to LLM-measured quantity and exhibited a similar trend across corpus. In particular, simpler texts like children stories exhibit lower branching in their semantic trees and correspondingly lower entropy rates, whereas fiction and poetry exhibit progressively larger branching factors and greater entropy rates. These results suggest that hierarchical semantic organization of texts is an important factor in their overall information transmission rates.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 80 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Feb 2026.

Builds on

22 of 80 references.

References · 22

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
  3. 2020Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Taskscited by 9,297
  4. 2020Scaling Laws for Neural Language Modelscited by 6,586
  5. 2023Lost in the Middle: How Language Models Use Long Contextscited by 3,455
  6. 2020The Pile: An 800GB Dataset of Diverse Text for Language Modelingcited by 2,411
  7. 2018Hierarchical Neural Story Generationcited by 1,193
  8. 2024RAPTOR: Recursive Abstractive Processing for Tree-Organized Retrievalcited by 532
  9. 2023TinyStories: How Small Can Language Models Be and Still Speak Coherent English?cited by 449
  10. 2024From Isolated Conversations to Hierarchical Schemas: Dynamic Tree Memory Representation for LLMscited by 79
  11. 2025Dynamic Chunking for End-to-End Hierarchical Sequence Modelingcited by 72
  12. 2023Tokenization Impacts Multilingual Language Modeling: Assessing Vocabulary Allocation and Overlap Across Languagescited by 62
10 more
  1. 2023LLMZip: Lossless Text Compression using Large Language Modelscited by 44
  2. 2024Is Semantic Chunking Worth the Computational Cost?cited by 43
  3. 2024LumberChunker: Long-Form Narrative Document Segmentationcited by 36
  4. 2024Algorithmic progress in language modelscited by 31
  5. 2026Deriving Neural Scaling Laws from the statistics of natural languagecited by 23
  6. 2025Hierarchical Document Refinement for Long-context Retrieval-augmented Generationcited by 16
  7. 2020Context Dependent Semantic Parsing: A Surveycited by 10
  8. 2023Large-scale study of human memory for meaningful narrativescited by 4
  9. 2024Random Tree Model of Meaningful Memorycited by 4
  10. 2024Information Theory of Meaningful Communicationcited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026The Probabilistic Structure of Large Language Models
  2. 2025Correlation Dimension of Auto-Regressive Large Language Models
  3. 2026Differences in Text Generated by Diffusion and Autoregressive Language Models
  4. 2026Parallelism, critical windows, and separations among diffusion language models
  5. 2024Lines of Thought in Large Language Models
  6. 2025Information Capacity: Evaluating the Efficiency of Large Language Models via Text Compression
  7. 2023Deep de Finetti: Recovering Topic Distributions from Large Language Models
  8. 2024Slaves to the Law of Large Numbers: An Asymptotic Equipartition Property for Perplexity in Generative Language Models