Large-scale study of human memory for meaningful narratives
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The statistical study of human memory requires large-scale experiments, involving many stimuli conditions and test subjects. While this approach has proven to be quite fruitful for meaningless material such as random lists of words, naturalistic stimuli, like narratives, have until now resisted such a large-scale study, due to the quantity of manual labor required to design and analyze such experiments. In this work, we develop a pipeline that uses large language models (LLMs) both to design naturalistic narrative stimuli for large-scale recall and recognition memory experiments, as well as to analyze the results. We performed online memory experiments with a large number of participants and collected recognition and recall data for narratives of different sizes. We found that both recall and recognition performance scale linearly with narrative length; however, for longer narratives people tend to summarize the content rather than recalling precise details. To investigate the role of narrative comprehension in memory, we repeated these experiments using scrambled versions of the narratives. Although recall performance declined significantly, recognition remained largely unaffected. Recalls in this condition seem to follow the original narrative order rather than the actual scrambled presentation, pointing to a contextual reconstruction of the story in memory. Finally, using LLM text embeddings, we construct a simple measure for each clause based on semantic similarity to the whole narrative, that shows a strong correlation with recall probability. Overall, our work demonstrates the power of LLMs in accessing new regimes in the study of human memory, as well as suggesting novel psychologically informed benchmarks for LLM performance.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 4 of its 55 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Nov 2023.
Builds on
4 of 55 references.
References · 4
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
- 2013Distributed Representations of Words and Phrases and their Compositionalitycited by 3,474
- 2023Large language models can segment narrative events similarly to humanscited by 16
- 2019Fundamental Law of Memory Recallcited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 1; 2026: 2.
4 papers.
- 2024Random Tree Model of Meaningful Memorycited by 4
- 2026Semantic Chunking and the Entropy of Natural Languagecited by 1
- 2025Language-agnostic, automated assessment of listeners' speech recall using large language modelscited by 0
- 2026Attention Flows: Tracing LLM Conceptual Engagement via Story Summariescited by 0
- 2026Attention Flows: Tracing LLM Conceptual Engagement via Story Summaries7 Apr 2026
- 2026Semantic Chunking and the Entropy of Natural Language13 Feb 2026
- 2025Language-agnostic, automated assessment of listeners' speech recall using large language models2 Mar 2025
- 2024Random Tree Model of Meaningful Memory2 Dec 2024