mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Robustness of Object Detection of Autonomous Vehicles in Adverse Weather Conditions

arXiv 2602.12902 ↗First posted 13 Feb 2026cs.CV cs.AI cs.LGcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

As self-driving technology advances toward widespread adoption, determining safe operational thresholds across varying environmental conditions becomes critical for public safety. This paper proposes a method for evaluating the robustness of object detection ML models in autonomous vehicles under adverse weather conditions. It employs data augmentation operators to generate synthetic data that simulates different severance degrees of the adverse operation conditions at progressive intensity levels to find the lowest intensity of the adverse conditions at which the object detection model fails. The robustness of the object detection model is measured by the average first failure coefficients (AFFC) over the input images in the benchmark. The paper reports an experiment with four object detection models: YOLOv5s, YOLOv11s, Faster R-CNN, and Detectron2, utilising seven data augmentation operators that simulate weather conditions fog, rain, and snow, and lighting conditions of dark, bright, flaring, and shadow. The experiment data show that the method is feasible, effective, and efficient to evaluate and compare the robustness of object detection models in various adverse operation conditions. In particular, the Faster R-CNN model achieved the highest robustness with an overall average AFFC of 71.9% over all seven adverse conditions, while YOLO variants showed the AFFC values of 43%. The method is also applied to assess the impact of model training that targets adverse operation conditions using synthetic data on model robustness. It is observed that such training can improve robustness in adverse conditions but may suffer from diminishing returns and forgetting phenomena (i.e., decline in robustness) if overtrained.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 22 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Feb 2026.

Builds on

13 of 22 references.

References · 13

  1. 2015Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networkscited by 9,617
  2. 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,114
  3. 2015You Only Look Once: Unified, Real-Time Object Detectioncited by 4,829
  4. 2019Benchmarking Neural Network Robustness to Common Corruptions and Perturbationscited by 2,857
  5. 2015DeepFool: a simple and accurate method to fool deep neural networkscited by 1,315
  6. 2017Semantic Foggy Scene Understanding with Synthetic Datacited by 401
  7. 2019Benchmarking Robustness in Object Detection: Autonomous Driving when Winter is Comingcited by 332
  8. 2018Dark Model Adaptation: Semantic Image Segmentation from Daytime to Nighttimecited by 122
  9. 2020DAWN: Vehicle Detection in Adverse Weather Nature Datasetcited by 41
  10. 2019Semantic Understanding of Foggy Scenes with Purely Synthetic Datacited by 22
  11. 2025Ultralytics YOLO Evolution: An Overview of YOLO27, YOLO26, YOLO11, YOLOv8, and YOLOv5 Object Detectors for Computer Vision and Pattern Recognitioncited by 17
  12. 2019SoilingNet: Soiling Detection on Automotive Surround-View Camerascited by 14
1 more
  1. 2023A Scenario-Based Functional Testing Approach to Improving DNN Performancecited by 7

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.