RBCorr: Response Bias Correction in Language Models
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Language models (LMs) are known to be prone to response biases, which present as option preference biases in fixed-response questions. It is therefore imperative to develop low-cost and effective response bias correction methods to improve LM performance and enable more accurate evaluations of model abilities. Here, we propose a simple response bias correction strategy (textttRBCorr) and test it on 12 open-weight language models using yes-no, entailment, and multiple choice questions. We show that response bias is prevalent in LMs pre-correction and that textttRBCorr effectively eliminates bias and boosts model performance. We also explore the generalizability of bias behavior across models, datasets, and prompt formats, showing that LogProbs-based correction is highly dependent on all three of these aspects. Overall, textttRBCorr is an easy-to-use method that can boost the performance of smaller LMs and ensure that LM performance on closed-response benchmarks aligns more closely with their true capabilities.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 27 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Feb 2026.
Builds on
17 of 27 references.
References · 17
- 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,768
- 2017A Broad-Coverage Challenge Corpus for Sentence Understanding through Inferencecited by 2,665
- 2022Beyond the Imitation Game: Quantifying and extrapolating the capabilities of language modelscited by 1,970
- 2015A large annotated corpus for learning natural language inferencecited by 1,837
- 2021Calibrate Before Use: Improving Few-Shot Performance of Language Modelscited by 1,371
- 2023Large Language Models Are Not Robust Multiple Choice Selectorscited by 454
- 2015Towards AI-Complete Question Answering: A Set of Prerequisite Toy Taskscited by 309
- 2024Leak, Cheat, Repeat: Data Contamination and Evaluation Malpractices in Closed-Source LLMscited by 224
- 2023Do LLMs exhibit human-like response biases? A case study in survey designcited by 176
- 2023Batch Calibration: Rethinking Calibration for In-Context Learning and Prompt Engineeringcited by 91
- 2023Mitigating Label Biases for In-context Learningcited by 88
- 2024Elements of World Knowledge (EWoK): A Cognition-Inspired Framework for Evaluating Basic World Knowledge in Language Modelscited by 55
5 more
- 2024Large Language Models Show Human-like Social Desirability Biases in Survey Responsescited by 27
- 2024Beyond Performance: Quantifying and Mitigating Label Bias in LLMscited by 24
- 2024The Vulnerability of Language Model Benchmarks: Do They Accurately Reflect True LLM Performance?cited by 22
- 2025How Do LLMs Use Their Depth?cited by 15
- 2024Prompt-Based Bias Calibration for Better Zero/Few-Shot Learning of Language Modelscited by 7
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
- 2026AMEL: Accumulated Message Effects on LLM Judgmentscited by 1
- 2026AMEL: Accumulated Message Effects on LLM Judgments21 May 2026