mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

RBCorr: Response Bias Correction in Language Models

arXiv 2602.12445 ↗First posted 12 Feb 2026cs.CL cs.LGcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Language models (LMs) are known to be prone to response biases, which present as option preference biases in fixed-response questions. It is therefore imperative to develop low-cost and effective response bias correction methods to improve LM performance and enable more accurate evaluations of model abilities. Here, we propose a simple response bias correction strategy (textttRBCorr) and test it on 12 open-weight language models using yes-no, entailment, and multiple choice questions. We show that response bias is prevalent in LMs pre-correction and that textttRBCorr effectively eliminates bias and boosts model performance. We also explore the generalizability of bias behavior across models, datasets, and prompt formats, showing that LogProbs-based correction is highly dependent on all three of these aspects. Overall, textttRBCorr is an easy-to-use method that can boost the performance of smaller LMs and ensure that LM performance on closed-response benchmarks aligns more closely with their true capabilities.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 27 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Feb 2026.

Builds on

17 of 27 references.

References · 17

  1. 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,768
  2. 2017A Broad-Coverage Challenge Corpus for Sentence Understanding through Inferencecited by 2,665
  3. 2022Beyond the Imitation Game: Quantifying and extrapolating the capabilities of language modelscited by 1,970
  4. 2015A large annotated corpus for learning natural language inferencecited by 1,837
  5. 2021Calibrate Before Use: Improving Few-Shot Performance of Language Modelscited by 1,371
  6. 2023Large Language Models Are Not Robust Multiple Choice Selectorscited by 454
  7. 2015Towards AI-Complete Question Answering: A Set of Prerequisite Toy Taskscited by 309
  8. 2024Leak, Cheat, Repeat: Data Contamination and Evaluation Malpractices in Closed-Source LLMscited by 224
  9. 2023Do LLMs exhibit human-like response biases? A case study in survey designcited by 176
  10. 2023Batch Calibration: Rethinking Calibration for In-Context Learning and Prompt Engineeringcited by 91
  11. 2023Mitigating Label Biases for In-context Learningcited by 88
  12. 2024Elements of World Knowledge (EWoK): A Cognition-Inspired Framework for Evaluating Basic World Knowledge in Language Modelscited by 55
5 more
  1. 2024Large Language Models Show Human-like Social Desirability Biases in Survey Responsescited by 27
  2. 2024Beyond Performance: Quantifying and Mitigating Label Bias in LLMscited by 24
  3. 2024The Vulnerability of Language Model Benchmarks: Do They Accurately Reflect True LLM Performance?cited by 22
  4. 2025How Do LLMs Use Their Depth?cited by 15
  5. 2024Prompt-Based Bias Calibration for Better Zero/Few-Shot Learning of Language Modelscited by 7

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.